The seeds of goldenrod (Solidago sp.) disperse on the wind, like dandelion or milkweed.
The seed heads are not as tidy as those other species, but I think they're both interesting and attractive when you get close enough.
Canon 300D, 80mm Olympus bellows lens at f/8, stacked at 0.0075", 12mm frame width.
The brown things sticking up seem to be left over flower parts. They're just papery husks that come off with the slightest provocation.
The seeds themselves are almost completely hidden from view in the photo above. There are about 20 of them, standing on end, each with its own "parasail" to catch the wind. That's assuming that the seeds ever actually get separated. They seem to be pretty thoroughly interleaved and I'm not sure just what it takes to get them apart!
Here is an individual seed.
38mm Olympus bellows lens at f/5.6, minimal stacking just to cover the seed itself.
You can see that the fibers of the sail are sort of feathered.
Here's what the fibers look like at much higher magnification (about 140X, as shown here).
20X NA 0.40 microscope objective, stacked at 0.0002", cropped, treated with PTLens to remove most of the CA, background cleaned up in Photoshop
Diffuse back lighting with fiber optic illuminator & pingpong balls..
--Rik
Goldenrod seeds
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23930
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23930
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Thanks for the feedback, guys! I'm pretty pleased with the way these turned out.
Initially I tried shooting the high magnification picture through my microscope, but I couldn't get the lighting right. I tried kludging a darkfield stop into my condenser, but the result ended up kind of "sparkly". (Come to think of it, I've seen a lot of other darkfield shots that had the same effect.) It reminded me of what I've seen with front lighting when the source is too small & not diffused. So I figured maybe I should go back to my macro setup. Dual-fiber illuminator with ping-pong balls near the tips, one on either side of the subject and slightly behind it. I like the way it rendered the transparent fibers. Wonder what else it's good for?
Nikola, good eyes! Short answer is that I can't tell. I still had the specimen mounted, so I put it in my microscope and took a closer look. The brown spots are real. They seem awfully round to be dust (as in broken rock). If I had to guess, I'd say pollen grains, though they're pretty small (around 5-7 microns diameter). See this post over in the micro forum.
--Rik
Initially I tried shooting the high magnification picture through my microscope, but I couldn't get the lighting right. I tried kludging a darkfield stop into my condenser, but the result ended up kind of "sparkly". (Come to think of it, I've seen a lot of other darkfield shots that had the same effect.) It reminded me of what I've seen with front lighting when the source is too small & not diffused. So I figured maybe I should go back to my macro setup. Dual-fiber illuminator with ping-pong balls near the tips, one on either side of the subject and slightly behind it. I like the way it rendered the transparent fibers. Wonder what else it's good for?
Nikola, good eyes! Short answer is that I can't tell. I still had the specimen mounted, so I put it in my microscope and took a closer look. The brown spots are real. They seem awfully round to be dust (as in broken rock). If I had to guess, I'd say pollen grains, though they're pretty small (around 5-7 microns diameter). See this post over in the micro forum.
--Rik
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23930
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact: