Search found 68 matches
- Tue Jan 21, 2014 3:08 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: comparison
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12560
Oh brother. I spent the day on this one beetle and then prepared my post with several images, and then it said the website timed out and I lost everything, as it wouldn't reload. Then the network device wasn't lighting and a replacement didn't either, though it did on my laptop. Then I tried to shut...
- Mon Jan 20, 2014 6:02 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: comparison
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12560
I am wondering if it has something to do with the small size of the beetle compared with the size of the pin. Every time I try one about this size, I have bad results. Even trying my method of just shooting a single at high aperture, I don't get a image comparable to what I usually do. Perhaps the p...
- Fri Jan 17, 2014 5:06 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: comparison
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12560
- Fri Jan 17, 2014 3:46 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: comparison
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12560
Still waiting for the last series to finish downloading. Nikon tech first told me (incorrectly) that there program doesn't preview) I got a trial ControlmyNikon and its comparison chart showed many more capabilities than Nikon Camera Control. I had to email tech support because so many things in the...
- Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:49 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: comparison
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12560
The motion I am concerned about is the camera shake. When I look through the viewfinder after each shot, there is a vibration that takes several seconds to stop. I am concerned that if the flash fires during the vibration, the lens may not be in the exact same position (besides forward) when it fire...
- Fri Jan 17, 2014 12:07 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: comparison
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12560
Yes can be moved. Yes the images got reversed because for some reason I kept getting a message that the first was too large., even though it was only ~300KB. I had loaded ones before that were about 1Mb, so I don't know why, I was changing the name in the save and made it even smaller and then it fi...
- Fri Jan 17, 2014 8:49 am
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: comparison
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12560
The previous 2 images were the same stack, just p& D methods in Zerene. Here are 2 area crops of the better, first image. http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/userpix/3832_201401161608_crop2_1.jpg http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/userpix/3832_20140116crop1_1.jpg I was having trouble with the 2...
- Thu Jan 16, 2014 4:11 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: comparison
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12560
Today I tried another Galerita species and its head. 200mm macro w/4X objective, F11 1/250. 'field was ~6mm. Used139 steps of about .03mm. 2 Zerene methods. I first thought they looked very good but noticed artifacts such as contour maps and some other unclear areas when I looked at higher mag. Atta...
- Thu Jan 16, 2014 3:59 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: comparison
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12560
- Tue Jan 14, 2014 4:32 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: comparison
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12560
The day started out badly., Yesterday, I had glued a piece of styrofaom to a little plate that slid into a mount with a click to lock in place, and this mount had a knob to do some positioning. Much better than my previous method of just pushing the styrofoam which was attached to nothing. So I got ...
- Tue Jan 14, 2014 6:35 am
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: comparison
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12560
I see that it does appear to be some kind of goniometer following the suggestion to search the web. What seems strange is that the 2 long arms are connected. Moving one adjustment makes one slide by the other and they cross, but can't be spread apart. Years ago, the 200mm lens pitched forward on a b...
- Tue Jan 14, 2014 12:13 am
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: comparison
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12560
Well, that was a nice final compliment, though exaggerated, as I hope to work towards the outstanding quality of your studio shots. I did have one cover on that cover page link of a Horse Fly face, and this could be much sharper as a studio stack, but this fly could have just flown away. I do hope f...
- Mon Jan 13, 2014 3:46 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: comparison
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12560
I am using a Nikon 200mm F4 AF ED-IF macro lens. Although I didn't crop the 2nd ruler test, the automatic galley macro reduces the size, of course. Can I put up a gallery of full size uncropped tiffs? I did the butterfly at about 45 degree angle and looked at the uncropped tiffs in CS6 Bridge at var...
- Mon Jan 13, 2014 11:08 am
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: comparison
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12560
- Mon Jan 13, 2014 10:30 am
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: comparison
- Replies: 75
- Views: 12560
I just ran the butterfly series with my Nikon 200mm macro which has F32 on the barrel but shows f45 at smallest aperture. This time I used the mirror lockup for the first time also. Never used it in the field. Focus was minimum at 1:1. Haven't transferred to the computer yet. Experimenting with Cont...