Melobasis sp. ? > Stigmodera - pictures added

Images taken in a controlled environment or with a posed subject. All subject types.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

AndrewC
Posts: 1436
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:05 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Melobasis sp. ? > Stigmodera - pictures added

Post by AndrewC »

I think this is some kind of Melobasis , perhaps our Antipodean friends can ID it ? All I know is that it originated near Perth, Australia.
body size is about 15mm.

ID: corrected to Stigmodera

Couple of issues with this specimen:

1) I'm not sure if it has a hairy ventral aspect or is that fungus ? i'm inclined to think that it is fungus in which case any ideas on how to clean it off ? Wipe with acetone ?

2) Seems to have lost a few segments from one antenna

3) You can see the lens but without a half silvered mirror I don't know a way around that :(

Anyways, pretty colourful beasty !

Image

Reversed El-Nik 50mm @ f8
16 x 819um stack, ZS
Diffused Nikon flash

A few extra images:

A dorsal view:

Image

higher mag on the head from above:

Image

Higher mag still profile:

Image
Last edited by AndrewC on Sat Jan 30, 2010 4:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
rgds, Andrew

"Is that an accurate dictionary ? Charlie Eppes

Planapo
Posts: 1581
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:33 am
Location: Germany, in the United States of Europe

Post by Planapo »

Andrew, From what I see, to me it doesn't look like fungal growth on the ventral side of your beetle. There are a lot of beetles and other insects whose normal ventral pilosity looks similar to this.
A closer inspection under higher magnification and probing with a pair of tweezers could give you some reassurance: If you grab the beetle by a bunch of its hairs and lift it up, I would expect fugal material to break off whereas the beetle's real hair should withstand the pulling force.

--Betty

AndrewC
Posts: 1436
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:05 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by AndrewC »

Planapo wrote:Andrew, From what I see, to me it doesn't look like fungal growth on the ventral side of your beetle. There are a lot of beetles and other insects whose normal ventral pilosity looks similar to this.
A closer inspection under higher magnification and probing with a pair of tweezers could give you some reassurance: If you grab the beetle by a bunch of its hairs and lift it up, I would expect fugal material to break off whereas the beetle's real hair should withstand the pulling force.

--Betty
I'd already given some good tugs this morning and they stayed firmly attached. I'll shoot some higher mag ventrals later and then you can give ne your considered opinion :)

Andrew
rgds, Andrew

"Is that an accurate dictionary ? Charlie Eppes

The BAT
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 5:32 pm
Location: Ballarat, Australia

Post by The BAT »

Hi Andrew,
I've seen bugs like that before, over here, in my travels and they definately had hairy bellies. . . :)
HTH,
Bruce

AndrewC
Posts: 1436
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:05 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by AndrewC »

The BAT wrote:Hi Andrew,
I've seen bugs like that before, over here, in my travels and they definately had hairy bellies. . . :)
HTH,
Bruce
Done deal - officially renamed as a "hairy_bellied_red_eyed_greeny_bluey_Ozzie_bug" :)
rgds, Andrew

"Is that an accurate dictionary ? Charlie Eppes

rovebeetle
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:21 am
Location: Vienna, Austria
Contact:

Re: Melobasis sp. ?

Post by rovebeetle »

AndrewC wrote:I think this is some kind of Melobasis
That is one of the countless species of the genus Stigmodera.
AndrewC wrote: 1) I'm not sure if it has a hairy ventral aspect or is that fungus ? i'm inclined to think that it is fungus in which case any ideas on how to clean it off ? Wipe with acetone ?
Betty is correct - the ventral pilosity is normal.
AndrewC wrote: 2) Seems to have lost a few segments from one antenna
Yes there are a few antennomeres missing.
AndrewC wrote: Anyways, pretty colourful beasty !
Agreed - but also perfectly captured.

Cheers
Harry

AndrewC
Posts: 1436
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:05 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by AndrewC »

Stigmodera because of the dimples in the elytra and general body shape ?

Andrew
rgds, Andrew

"Is that an accurate dictionary ? Charlie Eppes

Aynia
Posts: 724
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 7:42 am
Location: Europe somewhere
Contact:

Post by Aynia »

Third photo from the top is really great. It would be better if you cropped it a little bit. keeping the top bit.

The BAT
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 5:32 pm
Location: Ballarat, Australia

Post by The BAT »

Hi Andrew,
Pic #5 just became my favorite. . . beautiful pic of a great little Ozzie Bug.
Bruce

AndrewC
Posts: 1436
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:05 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by AndrewC »

Aynia / Bruce: thanks :)

This beetle is a great subject - so many compositions possible !

Aynia - I chose that crop because I like the back texture against the smooth head but it still isn't perfect and I will probably experiment some more :)

Andrew

rovebeetle
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:21 am
Location: Vienna, Austria
Contact:

Post by rovebeetle »

AndrewC wrote: Stigmodera because of the dimples in the elytra and general body shape ?

Andrew
Well, the generic characters are others (more cryptic ones) and I do not know them right now, but the pit-like elytral punctation usually is an unmistakable feature of many species of that genus. Melobasis never have this, also they are flatter. BTW - Melobasis is at least as speciose as Stigmodera.

Due to the additional images I am pretty sure that it is Stigmodera gratiosa.

I wonder if they look like that when found in nature. That metallic sheen is almost unnatural but very spectacular.

Cheers
Harry

AndrewC
Posts: 1436
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:05 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by AndrewC »

Last one of this beauty. Two things grabbed my attention about this subject - the surface texture and the metallic colours.

To show the surface textures I ran an even deeper head profile to extend down onto the elytra.

The colours - agonising :( These metallic interference colours can be taxing. I tried many kinds of diffusion and exposure and the best I've come up with is an HDR version. You have to take my word that this colour range isn't an HDR psychedelic drug rendering, it is as close as I can get to match what I see through a stereo scope. Of course if you rotate the subject the colours shift between blues and greens.

Anyway, that's this weekend's project finished :)

Image
rgds, Andrew

"Is that an accurate dictionary ? Charlie Eppes

elf
Posts: 1416
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 12:10 pm

Post by elf »

AndrewC wrote:Last one of this beauty. Two things grabbed my attention about this subject - the surface texture and the metallic colours.

To show the surface textures I ran an even deeper head profile to extend down onto the elytra.

The colours - agonising :( These metallic interference colours can be taxing. I tried many kinds of diffusion and exposure and the best I've come up with is an HDR version. You have to take my word that this colour range isn't an HDR psychedelic drug rendering, it is as close as I can get to match what I see through a stereo scope. Of course if you rotate the subject the colours shift between blues and greens.

Anyway, that's this weekend's project finished :)

Image

This looks like February's front page :smt023

Charles Krebs
Posts: 5865
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Contact:

Post by Charles Krebs »

All great, but this last addition is spectacular!

LordV
Posts: 1571
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 10:28 am
Location: UK

Post by LordV »

Wonderful subject and shots but as commented above the last addition is superb.
Brian v.
www.flickr.com/photos/lordv
canon20D,350D,40D,5Dmk2, sigma 105mm EX, Tamron 90mm, canon MPE-65

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic