| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
rjlittlefield Site Admin

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 12598 Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
|
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 4:28 pm Post subject: High style of a maple flower |
|
|
"In the Spring, a young man's fancy turns to thoughts of...umm..."
Tell me again, what did you say that thing was?!
Well, it's an object of lust, of course! With a bit of anthropomorphism, and only if you happen to be maple pollen.
This is in fact the end of one style of a maple flower, shot very "up close and personal".
You can see a whole flower HERE.
What you're looking at in the image above is less than 1 mm of the very tip of one of those brush-like styles curving up from the flower.
Pretty bizarre structure, eh?
I'm intrigued by those alternating clear and red sections that we can see in the silhouetted fingers. (There must be a technical term for those things. Anybody know what it is?)
From this one picture, it looks like the red and clear might be some sort of immiscible fluids. But I tried watching at 200X whilst I squashed a style between two microscope slides, and it seemed that while there are red and clear fluids, they are completely miscible and are kept separated by some sort of membrane. I have no idea what the red is or what purpose it might serve.
Hope you find this interesting, and I will greatly appreciate any other info you can add!
--Rik
Technical Details: Canon 300D camera, Nikon CF N Plan Achro 10X NA 0.30 objective at 15.6X, 250 mm away from the sensor. Electronic flash, 83 frames in 0.030" (0.00036" average step). Subject size as shown, 0.95 mm square. Stacked with Zerene Stacker, PMax and DMap combined by retouching.
Edit: to mention Zerene Stacker, which had not gone public at the time this post was originally made.
Last edited by rjlittlefield on Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:14 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bruce Williams

Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 1120 Location: Northamptonshire, England
|
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You've done a great job with this subject Rik. I would never have guessed what it was - you've produced something extraordinary from something relatively ordinary.
Bruce  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lauriek Site Admin

Joined: 25 Nov 2007 Posts: 2287 Location: South East UK
|
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Looks like some sort of chewy sweet to me! Fantastic!
Is that orangey vertical thing sticking up one of the red/clear tubes which has dried up? Or is it a sort of mini 'stem' structure to this part of the flower? _________________ Flickr | www.laurieknight.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjlittlefield Site Admin

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 12598 Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
|
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Bruce -- yes, these maple flowers look completely different up close than you'd expect them to!
Laurie, perhaps you're imagining an accretion of gummy worms?
About that orange thing, I'm not completely sure, but I think it's a bit of debris stuck to the backside of the style. I don't see any consistent structure like that at the style tips, but lots of the styles have similar looking fibers at various places. With some care, they can be teased away. I don't know what they are. They look somewhat like hairs from the bracts that surround the flower clusters. I didn't try to clean the styles before shooting them, just shopped around for a section that was oriented to make a decent composition.
You know, I just realized that I've been writing "style" and I actually meant "stigma" -- the receptive part of the pistil.
Oh well, I'll let the mistake stand. Not sure what I'd do with "stigma" in a title, anyway.
--Rik |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Graham46
Joined: 18 Dec 2008 Posts: 132 Location: Harford County, MD
|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Beautiful image Rik! Very interesting flower, and Im very impressed at the result of the stack |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aynia

Joined: 01 May 2008 Posts: 724 Location: Europe somewhere
|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 7:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Highly unusual. .. and great first pic too (missed that one before).
Fantastic stuff.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cyclops

Joined: 05 Aug 2006 Posts: 2718 Location: North East of England
|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excellent shot Rik! _________________ Canon 30D | EOS Rebel 2000-film(aka EOS 300) | Panasonic FZ-7 EB | Vivitar/Cosina 100mm f3.5 macro lens | EF 75-300 f4.5-5.6 USM III | EF 50 f1.8 II | Vivitar Series 1 19-35 f3.5-4.5 | Slik 88 Tripod. | My new blog:
http://mybackyardsafari.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lauriek Site Admin

Joined: 25 Nov 2007 Posts: 2287 Location: South East UK
|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gummy worms, that was exactly what I was thinking! They can stick together in a lump like that if I remember correctly...
Shame Ken doesn't make it over here much, bet he'd like those!  _________________ Flickr | www.laurieknight.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cyclops

Joined: 05 Aug 2006 Posts: 2718 Location: North East of England
|
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mmmmmmmmmmmm, Gummy Worms!!  _________________ Canon 30D | EOS Rebel 2000-film(aka EOS 300) | Panasonic FZ-7 EB | Vivitar/Cosina 100mm f3.5 macro lens | EF 75-300 f4.5-5.6 USM III | EF 50 f1.8 II | Vivitar Series 1 19-35 f3.5-4.5 | Slik 88 Tripod. | My new blog:
http://mybackyardsafari.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Planapo Site Admin

Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1424 Location: Germany, in the United States of Europe
|
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 5:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Very interesting and well documented, Rik!
| Quote: | | I'm intrigued by those alternating clear and red sections that we can see in the silhouetted fingers. (There must be a technical term for those things. Anybody know what it is?) |
I know of the term "papillate stigma" that is in use. I'd presume, that your maple flower here has such one.
So, I think you could call these gummy-worm-like structures papillae (sing. papilla).
--Betty |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cyclops

Joined: 05 Aug 2006 Posts: 2718 Location: North East of England
|
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 6:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Planapo wrote: |
So, I think you could call these gummy-worm-like structures papillae (sing. papilla).
--Betty |
Papilla,oh papilla we love you sooo...
(You said sing papilla! ) _________________ Canon 30D | EOS Rebel 2000-film(aka EOS 300) | Panasonic FZ-7 EB | Vivitar/Cosina 100mm f3.5 macro lens | EF 75-300 f4.5-5.6 USM III | EF 50 f1.8 II | Vivitar Series 1 19-35 f3.5-4.5 | Slik 88 Tripod. | My new blog:
http://mybackyardsafari.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjlittlefield Site Admin

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 12598 Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
|
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 7:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Cyclops wrote: |
Papilla,oh papilla we love you sooo...
(You said sing papilla! ) |
| Planapo wrote: |
So, I think you could call these gummy-worm-like structures papillae (sing. papilla).
--Betty |
Thanks, Betty! That sounds like some word I knew a long time ago but couldn't remember. (Too many words, too many words...! )
Any ideas about the red fluid?
--Rik |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Planapo Site Admin

Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1424 Location: Germany, in the United States of Europe
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|