Variegated Fritillary

Images of undisturbed subjects in their natural environment. All subject types.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

salden
Posts: 1363
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 1:40 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Variegated Fritillary

Post by salden »

At least I believe this is a Variegated Fritillary.

Image
Sue Alden

lauriek
Posts: 2402
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 6:57 am
Location: South East UK
Contact:

Post by lauriek »

Really nice shot, has an almost film like feel about it, I assume it is digital?

salden
Posts: 1363
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 1:40 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Post by salden »

Yes, this is digital.

Canon 1Ds
Canon 100mm Macro 2.8 with Kenko extension tube
Sue Alden

Argusray
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 2:45 pm
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Contact:

Post by Argusray »

Very nice shot. With subjects like this, do you usually shoot with available light alone or do you use a strobe?

Argusray

salden
Posts: 1363
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 1:40 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Post by salden »

This was taken in natural light during the hottest part of the day. You can see where the sun hitting on the flowers and the light on the leaves at the front of the image.

Techs:

Canon 1Ds
Canon 100mm Macro 2.8
Kenko extension tubes
1/200 sec @ F7.1
Manual Exposure
Handheld
ISO 100
Sue Alden

Ken Ramos
Posts: 7208
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 2:12 pm
Location: lat=35.4005&lon=-81.9841

Post by Ken Ramos »

This is a nice shot, I like it :D but those or that bunch of leaves down in the lower left corner, they sort of look okay but then kind'a distracting, don't cha' think? :-k

salden
Posts: 1363
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 1:40 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Post by salden »

Ken Ramos wrote:This is a nice shot, I like it :D but those or that bunch of leaves down in the lower left corner, they sort of look okay but then kind'a distracting, don't cha' think? :-k
Yes, the leaves are distracting, but I could not crop them out or move around for a better angle on the butterfly and get him head on. Some times you have to work around things :lol:
Sue Alden

Ken Ramos
Posts: 7208
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 2:12 pm
Location: lat=35.4005&lon=-81.9841

Post by Ken Ramos »

Yeah, suppose so. Been there, done that myself. :lol:

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 23626
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Post by rjlittlefield »

Nice angle and lighting . :D

ID is Painted Lady, Vanessa cardui. The Variegated Fritillary Euptoieta claudia looks somewhat similar, but a lot of the details are different, see for example this NABA page.

Those lower left leaves might be less distracting if they were blurred out in Photoshop. But I never know until I try it. :?

--Rik

salden
Posts: 1363
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 1:40 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Post by salden »

Thanks Rik, I should have know it was a painted lady, I photographed enough of them last year.

I will attempt a blur in PS to see what happens. Help your self. I do not care if someone "rearranges" my images to try out something.
Sue Alden

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 23626
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Post by rjlittlefield »

salden wrote:Help your self. I do not care if someone "rearranges" my images to try out something.
Here's what I was thinking of. It's a Gaussian blur, 1.5 pixels, masked to apply only to the background and the troublesome leaves. Don't know how much it helps -- I've looked at the image too long at this point. :? :lol:

--Rik

Image

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic