Just a cactus
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
-
- Posts: 5786
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 2:17 am
- Location: Reading, Berkshire, England
My screen is not callibrated. The background is black and the terracotta pot, purple petals and green stigma all look as I would expect.
The only thing I would challenge is the title. I would say that there is no such thing as "just a cactus".
Harold
The only thing I would challenge is the title. I would say that there is no such thing as "just a cactus".
Harold
My images are a medium for sharing some of my experiences: they are not me.
- augusthouse
- Posts: 1195
- Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2006 1:39 am
- Location: New South Wales Australia
You know; it occurred to me a while back just how important a good monitor is for our purposes with regard to photography.
It is basically the window into our digital darkroom. We can have the best camera gear around; but if our window is foggy it makes things a whole lot more difficult and universally less accurate especially in post production or 'developing'.
Consideration in regard to monitor selection should be up there with camera selection - it's that important! You don't need to spend a fortune to get a beauty.
Dave, do you want to know what the colour of that velvet is in Australia????
Yep, I use a Spyder3.
That is a beautiful flower.
Craig
It is basically the window into our digital darkroom. We can have the best camera gear around; but if our window is foggy it makes things a whole lot more difficult and universally less accurate especially in post production or 'developing'.
Consideration in regard to monitor selection should be up there with camera selection - it's that important! You don't need to spend a fortune to get a beauty.
Dave, do you want to know what the colour of that velvet is in Australia????
Yep, I use a Spyder3.
That is a beautiful flower.
Craig
To use a classic quote from 'Antz' - "I almost know exactly what I'm doing!"
- rovebeetle
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:21 am
- Location: Vienna, Austria
- Contact:
What a splendour! All my cacti at home have rather inconspicuous white or purple flowers.
The BG appears uniformly black here in my office but that's a cheap (although calibrated) 19" CRT and I do not trust it very much.
I will have a look again at home on my new EIZO 2431. Talking about brightness. When calibrating the EIZO I had to turn down the brightness to 23% to achieve 140cd/cm² at 6500K. Many graphic geeks even work with 120cd/cm².
Cheers
That might be the reason, because in virtually all monitors the factory settings are way too bright.rjlittlefield wrote:Currently my monitors are all running as out-of-the-box.
The BG appears uniformly black here in my office but that's a cheap (although calibrated) 19" CRT and I do not trust it very much.
I will have a look again at home on my new EIZO 2431. Talking about brightness. When calibrating the EIZO I had to turn down the brightness to 23% to achieve 140cd/cm² at 6500K. Many graphic geeks even work with 120cd/cm².
Cheers
Harry
-
- Posts: 5786
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 2:17 am
- Location: Reading, Berkshire, England
Maybe you should try some epicactus hybrids, their flowers being up to a foot (30cm) across, in white through pink to red, sometimes yellow and all combinations, often scented too. Parodia/Notocactus have at least yellows, oranges, reds or purples and are typically a couple of inches across. Rebutia and Lobivia have smaller flowers (often red orange or yellow) but lots of them.rovebeetle wrote:What a splendour! All my cacti at home have rather inconspicuous white or purple flowers.
Cheers
Harold
My images are a medium for sharing some of my experiences: they are not me.
- rovebeetle
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:21 am
- Location: Vienna, Austria
- Contact:
Harold, please stop it I'm already drooling! Seriously, the maintainance of our cacti is my wife's business (and hobby), and as soon as our little one gets a bit older and needs less care I will go and buy her some of the genera you suggested.Harold Gough wrote:Maybe you should try some epicactus hybrids, their flowers being up to a foot (30cm) across, in white through pink to red, sometimes yellow and all combinations, often scented too. Parodia/Notocactus have at least yellows, oranges, reds or purples and are typically a couple of inches across. Rebutia and Lobivia have smaller flowers (often red orange or yellow) but lots of them.rovebeetle wrote:What a splendour! All my cacti at home have rather inconspicuous white or purple flowers.
Cheers
Harold
Thanks
Harry
"Dave, do you want to know what the colour of that velvet is in Australia."
Yes please, but bear in mind Craig you being in Australia will obviously be looking at the back of the velvet!
Epicacti are florists flowers Harold!
As Harold says the Notocacti mostly have quite large yellow flowers, but there are some different coloured ones. Notocactus rutilans for instance.
(is the background black on this one?)
DaveW
Yes please, but bear in mind Craig you being in Australia will obviously be looking at the back of the velvet!
Epicacti are florists flowers Harold!
As Harold says the Notocacti mostly have quite large yellow flowers, but there are some different coloured ones. Notocactus rutilans for instance.
(is the background black on this one?)
DaveW
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23564
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Sorry, I misspoke. I turn down the maximum brightness too. But when I do that, I check to be sure that I haven't messed up the black point.rovebeetle wrote:That might be the reason, because in virtually all monitors the factory settings are way too bright.rjlittlefield wrote:Currently my monitors are all running as out-of-the-box.
The BG appears uniformly black here in my office but that's a cheap (although calibrated) 19" CRT and I do not trust it very much.
With the camera I just tested, there are 3 f-stops of exposure between getting RGB=32 and getting RGB=7.
If a monitor and its environment is set so that RGB=32 is black, then it's throwing away at least 3 f-stops of shadow detail, compared to a setting such that RGB=3 is black, and RGB=4 is not. The former setting is great if you like rich blacks and don't care about shadow detail. Personally I hate throwing away 3 f-stops of dynamic range in my subject.
--Rik
- rovebeetle
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:21 am
- Location: Vienna, Austria
- Contact:
Oh my goodness, so much beauty!
BTW - I have now looked at the original image on my home monitor and I can also see the "ripples". In addition, there are some other "patches" which look like finger prints on the screen but they are in the picture. My guess is that all this is just on the BG canvas which is not perfectly black in the image (and Eizo monitors are known for their excellent "black".
Cheers
BTW - I have now looked at the original image on my home monitor and I can also see the "ripples". In addition, there are some other "patches" which look like finger prints on the screen but they are in the picture. My guess is that all this is just on the BG canvas which is not perfectly black in the image (and Eizo monitors are known for their excellent "black".
Cheers
Harry
- rovebeetle
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 4:21 am
- Location: Vienna, Austria
- Contact:
Seems we posted almost simultaneously. You are right of course. I don't like blocked shadows either.rjlittlefield wrote:Sorry, I misspoke. I turn down the maximum brightness too. But when I do that, I check to be sure that I haven't messed up the black point.rovebeetle wrote:That might be the reason, because in virtually all monitors the factory settings are way too bright.rjlittlefield wrote:Currently my monitors are all running as out-of-the-box.
The BG appears uniformly black here in my office but that's a cheap (although calibrated) 19" CRT and I do not trust it very much.
With the camera I just tested, there are 3 f-stops of exposure between getting RGB=32 and getting RGB=7.
If a monitor and its environment is set so that RGB=32 is black, then it's throwing away at least 3 f-stops of shadow detail, compared to a setting such that RGB=3 is black, and RGB=4 is not. The former setting is great if you like rich blacks and don't care about shadow detail. Personally I hate throwing away 3 f-stops of dynamic range in my subject.
--Rik
So, as I wrote above, what we see is most likely some texture of the BG canvas, it doesn't look like posterization.
Cheers
Harry
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23564
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Not quite, but pretty close.DaveW wrote:(is the background black on this one?)
I can see some coarse texture to the left of the flower, roughly at the place where it meets the outline of the pot, and bits of dark gray at other places scattered around. Photoshop reports that the area left of the flower has an average value around 9, with a significant number of pixels up around 18.
Try adding a Photoshop levels adjustment layer and adjusting the middle slider until its number is up around 3. I think you'll be surprised to see how much detail is hiding back there.
--Rik