| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
rjlittlefield Site Admin

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 7323 Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 12:24 am Post subject: Crane fly face |
|
|
It's crane fly week, I guess, and since this one turned up in a spiderweb, I figured maybe the spider could catch something else.
This beast is relatively large, but it was so fresh that stacking it was a challenge because the antennae wilted as I shot.
Actually I thought this stack was going to be a total loss, but with some aggressive cropping and careful masking, well...you decide...
--Rik
Technical: Canon 300D, Olympus 38 mm f/2.8 bellows lens at f/4, flash with tissue diffusion and aluminum foil reflector, 78 frames at 0.001" focus step stacked with HF, background masked to uniform color in Photoshop. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Harold Gough
Joined: 09 Mar 2008 Posts: 2261 Location: Reading, Berkshire, England
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 5:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Very pleasing. I especially like the colour and composition of the top one.
Harold _________________ Committed to the use of fine grain colour reversal film and manual focus lenses. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lauriek Site Admin

Joined: 25 Nov 2007 Posts: 1354 Location: South East UK
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 5:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ahh the old saggy antennae problem, I had that with my cranefly - my first stack was of the whole head and most of the antennae but when I looked at the pictures each one had the antennae in a slightly different position, that's why I ended up zooming in on just the eye on that specimen!!
Looks good to me, like Harold I think I prefer the first... I plan to do another one of these with the specimen held upside down so hopefully gravity will hold the antennae in place!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Harold Gough
Joined: 09 Mar 2008 Posts: 2261 Location: Reading, Berkshire, England
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 6:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lauriek wrote: | | I plan to do another one of these with the specimen held upside down so hopefully gravity will hold the antennae in place!! |
Devilish cunning!
The powers affecting shrinkage might be more than those of gravity.
Harold _________________ Committed to the use of fine grain colour reversal film and manual focus lenses. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
beetleman

Joined: 04 Aug 2006 Posts: 3578 Location: Southern New Hampshire USA
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excellent work Rik. Lots of great Detail. I have probably looked at this 10 times already. Are the mouthparts basicly for lapping juices? _________________ Take Nothing but Pictures--Leave Nothing but Footprints.
Doug Breda |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjlittlefield Site Admin

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 7323 Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 9:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the feedback, guys.
I see I forgot to mention that the second image is just a crop from the same stack. It shows how much detail there is hiding behind the web-sized version.
Doug, it's a good question what this thing eats, if at all. My Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Insects & Spiders has three main blocks dedicated to crane flies. They say "Adult eats little" (once) and "Adult does not eat" (twice). So I dunno.
--Rik |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lauriek Site Admin

Joined: 25 Nov 2007 Posts: 1354 Location: South East UK
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
I know the larvae of these (leatherjackets) are a pest which eat lots of plant roots, and I know some insects don't eat at all as an adult, but what would the point be of having a mouth if the adult didn't eat at all? (Mind you I've seen a million of these things and I've never seen one eating anything!!)
Harold you could well be right about shrinkage being more powerful than gravity but it's worth a shot!! I'll let you know how it goes!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjlittlefield Site Admin

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 7323 Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 10:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lauriek wrote: | | what would the point be of having a mouth if the adult didn't eat at all? |
There's always the possibility that what used to be mouthparts have been co-opted or reduced to other functions, such as chemical sensing to find good spots to lay eggs.
My personal guess would be that these critters do a bit of sipping when nobody's watching, but that's based on no real information.
About the upside-down mounting strategy, I think it would have worked fine on this specimen. I thought about doing that, but I wanted the light coming apparently "from above" and I was too lazy to rework my setup so that would be physically from below.
--Rik |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Harold Gough
Joined: 09 Mar 2008 Posts: 2261 Location: Reading, Berkshire, England
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lauriek wrote: | | I know the larvae of these (leatherjackets) are a pest which eat lots of plant roots, and I know some insects don't eat at all as an adult, but what would the point be of having a mouth if the adult didn't eat at all? (Mind you I've seen a million of these things and I've never seen one eating anything!!) |
The selective pressure is on the larvae having functional mouthparts. While there is no selective pressure to have such as adults there may be none to lose them either. They may be redundant but (I assume) do no harm either, making the selective pressure neutral (almost certainly not the correct term). If it ain't broke, don't fix it! (I don't think Darwin actually said that but he would have supported the spirit of it).
Harold _________________ Committed to the use of fine grain colour reversal film and manual focus lenses. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjlittlefield Site Admin

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 7323 Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Selective pressure is a tricky thing.
Resources used to grow mouthparts are not available to grow, say, more eggs.
So unused parts always have an "opportunity cost". The critter that can get rid of them without breaking something else will be a step ahead of the competition.
--Rik |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
acerola

Joined: 13 Dec 2006 Posts: 251 Location: Hungary
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 12:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I uploaded one more picture for the cranefly day. Just to add something for the discussion. I think I photographed the eating adult. http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=29522#29522
And great stack by the way. There is one specimen in my fridge for over a month. I will work wiht something else now, that first Laurie now you explored this subject. _________________ Péter |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjlittlefield Site Admin

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 7323 Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| acerola wrote: | | I think I photographed the eating adult. |
I think so too -- excellent!
--Rik |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gpmatthews
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 748 Location: Horsham, W. Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
...not sure about the legs, they do seem to use them for stabilisation in flight. They also see to lose them quite easily, so maybe they are used as a defence mechanism - hungry predator ends up with a mouthful of useless legs and cranefly escapes for another day, albeit with a limp!
Some parts of the legs are visible in an old post of mine at http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1290&highlight= which I guess makes for interesting comparison, especially as the eyes are so different. _________________ Graham
Though we lean upon the same balustrade, the colours of the mountain are different. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rjlittlefield Site Admin

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 7323 Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gpmatthews wrote: | | ...especially as the eyes are so different. |
I notice in that topic, you mention that the fly had been "waiting some time for its portrait to be taken".
I wonder, did your fly have some chance to dry out before being photographed? The eyes lose their iridescence quickly when drying.
--Rik |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gpmatthews
Joined: 03 Aug 2006 Posts: 748 Location: Horsham, W. Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rik - that's possible, although I'm pretty sure they were in fact black, but more lustrous when fresh. _________________ Graham
Though we lean upon the same balustrade, the colours of the mountain are different. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|