View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Beatsy

Joined: 05 Jul 2013 Posts: 1478 Location: Malvern, UK
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 9:09 am Post subject: Female parasitic wasp - possibly Dusona sp. |
|
|
Edit: changed title to reflect ID correction from AlxndrBrg (thanks again for that).
Stack of 210 images at 2.1x (Linoscan 90mm film scanner lens). The FoV is about 15mm wide. Background is a quick bit of fakery - just a blurred shot of some undergrowth dropped in with Affinity Photo. Bored of black!

Last edited by Beatsy on Sun Jun 10, 2018 10:06 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JH

Joined: 09 Mar 2013 Posts: 1188 Location: Vallentuna, Stockholm, Sweden
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Very nice, the light on the wings are superb.
Best regards
Jörgen Hellberg _________________ Jörgen Hellberg, my webbsite www.hphoto.se |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ChrisR Site Admin
Joined: 14 Mar 2009 Posts: 8175 Location: Near London, UK
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 11:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Really good. _________________ Chris R |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AlxndrBrg
Joined: 14 Jan 2014 Posts: 51
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 12:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nice, but its not an Ichneumon sp., nor is it Ichneumonini or Ichneumoninae, but it belongs to the Ichneumonidae though
Should be the subfamily Campopleginae, something like the genus Dusona.
Oh, and its a female, the ovipositor is quite short, but visible |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lou Jost
Joined: 04 Sep 2015 Posts: 3192 Location: Ecuador
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Beatsy

Joined: 05 Jul 2013 Posts: 1478 Location: Malvern, UK
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2018 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AlxndrBrg wrote: | Nice, but its not an Ichneumon sp., nor is it Ichneumonini or Ichneumoninae, but it belongs to the Ichneumonidae though
Should be the subfamily Campopleginae, something like the genus Dusona.
Oh, and its a female, the ovipositor is quite short, but visible |
Gosh - I honestly thought, for once, I'd actually nailed the ID myself (using online resources). I'll look it up tomorrow and edit as appropriate. Appreciate the info - even if it has rather burst my bubble!
It is frustrating to be so consistently rubbish at ID'ing insects though...
Thanks all for the other comments too. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mjkzz
Joined: 01 Jul 2015 Posts: 1008 Location: California/Shenzhen
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AlxndrBrg
Joined: 14 Jan 2014 Posts: 51
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2018 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Beatsy wrote: |
Gosh - I honestly thought, for once, I'd actually nailed the ID myself (using online resources). I'll look it up tomorrow and edit as appropriate. Appreciate the info - even if it has rather burst my bubble!
It is frustrating to be so consistently rubbish at ID'ing insects though...
Thanks all for the other comments too. |
I'm sorry to have burst your bubble, perhaps I should add that Ichneumonidae (and the Ichneumonoidea as a whole) are extremely morphologically diverse with colour patterns and shapes recurring all over the place - trying to ID them to species (or even genus/tribus) is basically impossible unless you are a real dedicated expert. So dont consider yourself rubbish at ID'ing insects, apart from a handful of experts the rest of us in the world are in the same boat
Same goes for Chalcidoidea, Cynipoidea, Ceraphronoidea, Diaprioidea, Proctotrupoidea and Platygastroidea I'm afraid...
I really recommend the "Hymenopterist Forum" on facebook for ID's of most hymenopterans. You British people are lucky in that Gavin Broad from the NHM is active there, he's "rather" good at Ichneumonoidea |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Beatsy

Joined: 05 Jul 2013 Posts: 1478 Location: Malvern, UK
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2018 10:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nah, my bubble is repaired again
I've changed the title to reflect your earlier comment. Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sumguy01
Joined: 28 Jan 2013 Posts: 1254 Location: Ketchikan Alaska USA
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Very nice.
Thanks for sharing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|