Mitutoyo M Plan APO 20X question
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
-
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 3:18 pm
- Location: Tennessee
- Contact:
Mitutoyo M Plan APO 20X question
Hi All,
Can anyone tell me the difference between the current model 378-804-3, and the older model 378-804-2? I assume it has been improved in some way.
Thanks
Can anyone tell me the difference between the current model 378-804-3, and the older model 378-804-2? I assume it has been improved in some way.
Thanks
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:54 am
- Location: Nottinghamshire, England
Unless Mitutoyo claim that the new version has some advantages, the only way to find out will be to compare the performance of the two versions.
That will be expensive - and you may find that there is no clear difference, as for example when the design of the 10x was refreshed in 2013:
http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/v ... hp?t=20737
There are many reasons for refreshing a design. For example, supplies of a particular glass may no longer be available for environmental or economic reasons.
Sigma said that one reason they discontinued production of their excellent 70mm macro lens was because they could no longer obtain the special glass for one of its elements.
http://sigma-rumors.com/2014/11/kazuto- ... challenge/
Henry
That will be expensive - and you may find that there is no clear difference, as for example when the design of the 10x was refreshed in 2013:
http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/v ... hp?t=20737
There are many reasons for refreshing a design. For example, supplies of a particular glass may no longer be available for environmental or economic reasons.
Sigma said that one reason they discontinued production of their excellent 70mm macro lens was because they could no longer obtain the special glass for one of its elements.
http://sigma-rumors.com/2014/11/kazuto- ... challenge/
Henry
Feel free to edit my images.
-
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 3:18 pm
- Location: Tennessee
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2015 9:21 pm
- Location: Hocking County, Ohio , USA
Looks like the 378-804-3 is 100 g. lighter. I also found this reference that the 378-804-3 uses eco friendly glass. See if these links are helpful
http://www.artisantg.com/info/ATGgevdr.pdf page 12
http://www.mitutoyo.com/wp-content/uplo ... 010611.pdf page 19
http://www.google.com/search?q=Mitutoyo ... e&ie=UTF-8 6th link down refers to eco friendly glass
Seems Google likes to shuffle things. The last link is incorrect but here it is
www.mcbainsystems.com/pdf/Mitutoyo_optics_broch.pdf
glass-thickness compensation objectives that allow observation of a vacuum furnace interior through a glass, for example. • Taking eco-friendliness into account, the Mitutoyo microscope lens. (Order No. 378-XXX-3) employs environmentally friendly glass as the lens material (it has no lead or arsenic). • The FS70 series can ...
http://www.artisantg.com/info/ATGgevdr.pdf page 12
http://www.mitutoyo.com/wp-content/uplo ... 010611.pdf page 19
http://www.google.com/search?q=Mitutoyo ... e&ie=UTF-8 6th link down refers to eco friendly glass
Seems Google likes to shuffle things. The last link is incorrect but here it is
www.mcbainsystems.com/pdf/Mitutoyo_optics_broch.pdf
glass-thickness compensation objectives that allow observation of a vacuum furnace interior through a glass, for example. • Taking eco-friendliness into account, the Mitutoyo microscope lens. (Order No. 378-XXX-3) employs environmentally friendly glass as the lens material (it has no lead or arsenic). • The FS70 series can ...
-
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 3:18 pm
- Location: Tennessee
- Contact:
Geopressure,Geopressure wrote:It seems that optical performance comparisons are hard to come by, though I have had someone tell me privately that one example of the current 378-804-3 tested better than one of the older models.
I'd suggest not reading much into this single observation.
A number of dozens of Mitutoyo objectives (multiple samples of all magnifications from 2x-100x) have passed through my hands for comparative testing against my own set. While specimens of a given magnification have varied in minor outward details, and surely represent changes in model (I've not recorded model numbers), I've never noticed any trend that either older or newer models are better than the other. Pretty clearly, if design details have changed, performance standards have been constant.
While "bad" specimens of Mitutoyo objectives are not uncommon (they have likely been bumped out of internal alignment), there is inevitable variation among "good" specimens. No two Mitutoyo objectives I've ever seen render exactly alike under sufficient pixel peeping. After studying their images a while, I could easily identify which lens made a given photograph. Some specimens are a bit sharper in the center, while others maintain sharpness better towards the edges; some have a bit more contrast than others, combined with some off-putting trait such as a tiny bit of false color along the focus axis.
From this testing experience, and reading about how lenses and their internal elements are produced, I'm convinced that these objectives are assembled by hand from elements that have considerable variation; that mixing and matching of elements is performed to offset these variations; and that while each lens released must be within a specification range for a number of criteria, sample variation is inevitable. Each resultant lens will have its own character--at least under extremely picky comparison.
But none of this seems to relate to the model number on the Mitutoyo barrel, or the cosmetics of the lens.
My advice with Mitutoyo objectives is to buy without regard to a lens' age or model number. If second-hand, purchase only with a return privilege, and test carefully before acceptance. If new, simply purchase and enjoy.
--Chris S.
-
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 3:18 pm
- Location: Tennessee
- Contact:
HelloChris S. wrote: My advice with Mitutoyo objectives is to buy without regard to a lens' age or model number. If second-hand, purchase only with a return privilege, and test carefully before acceptance. If new, simply purchase and enjoy.
--Chris S.
In the very wide range of MITUTOYO microscopes, what models are most suitable for the MACRO and the most recommendable?
thank you for your reply
retired from the wine and vine, amateur of macro photography and who speaks English with difficulty. Mr Google will help me. Thank you for your indulgence.
- enricosavazzi
- Posts: 1478
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 2:41 pm
- Location: Västerås, Sweden
- Contact:
Talking about Mitutoyo microscopes to be used as photomacroscopes, I would say that the models that take M Plan Apo objectives are the most useful. This would be in practice the FS-70 and the older FS-60. Most of the stands have no provision for transmitted illumination, and do not allow enough lifting of the head to fit a transmitted illuminator on the stage, especially not a darkfield illuminator. One may use a flat LED panel or similar for brightfield transmitted illumination with these stands, but then it is only diffused illumination. The FS-60 and FS-70 are occasionally advertised on eBay. One nice thing is that they provide an erect image in the eyepieces (not inverted).
There are several different stands and heads. I find coaxial illumination with these scopes essentially useless for generic macro subjects, but it may be the only feasible way to illuminate certain types of samples.
See e.g. http://savazzi.net/photography/mitutoyo_fs-60.htm
There are more expensive Mitutoyo scopes that rarely appear on the second hand market, like those designed for the M Plan Apo HR series of objectives.
There are several different stands and heads. I find coaxial illumination with these scopes essentially useless for generic macro subjects, but it may be the only feasible way to illuminate certain types of samples.
See e.g. http://savazzi.net/photography/mitutoyo_fs-60.htm
There are more expensive Mitutoyo scopes that rarely appear on the second hand market, like those designed for the M Plan Apo HR series of objectives.
--ES
From here: https://www.edmundoptics.com/microscopy ... bjectives/
Mitutoyos are popular because of their long Working Distance WD, and apochromatic properties.
You need enough space to allow lighting. The SL Super Long WD versions have more WD than you probably need, but a smaller NA , so less resolution.
HR versions are Higher Resolution centrally, but have a smaller usable field which may not cover your sensor.
So, avoid SL or HR versions.
For normal microscopes there are alternatives from Nikon or Olympus. New they aren't better overall, though used they may offer better value, at some magnifications.
2x 0.055 There are better options for 2x on a camera, but having this in your set would be convenient
5x 0.14 Very good.
7.5x 0.21 Disproportionately expensive when compared with the others, but a very nice-to-have useful lens
10x 0.28 Very popular indeed.
20x 0.42 Very good,
50x 0.55 Very good,
100x 0.7 Very good but a modest improvement over the 50x
For members of this forum, popularity is probably in about this order:
10x, 5x, 20x 50x, 2x 100x
but it depends if you have something which works below 5X.
Most of us are NOT using them on microscopes. This means we can use a shorter "tube" lens to get a high quality lower magnification image. EG a 135mm lens gives 135/200 = 0.675x the magnification.
Buying used is risky, a lot seem to get damaged without showing any external sign.
J'espère que c'est le genre de conseil que vous cherchiez!
Mitutoyos are popular because of their long Working Distance WD, and apochromatic properties.
You need enough space to allow lighting. The SL Super Long WD versions have more WD than you probably need, but a smaller NA , so less resolution.
HR versions are Higher Resolution centrally, but have a smaller usable field which may not cover your sensor.
So, avoid SL or HR versions.
For normal microscopes there are alternatives from Nikon or Olympus. New they aren't better overall, though used they may offer better value, at some magnifications.
2x 0.055 There are better options for 2x on a camera, but having this in your set would be convenient
5x 0.14 Very good.
7.5x 0.21 Disproportionately expensive when compared with the others, but a very nice-to-have useful lens
10x 0.28 Very popular indeed.
20x 0.42 Very good,
50x 0.55 Very good,
100x 0.7 Very good but a modest improvement over the 50x
For members of this forum, popularity is probably in about this order:
10x, 5x, 20x 50x, 2x 100x
but it depends if you have something which works below 5X.
Most of us are NOT using them on microscopes. This means we can use a shorter "tube" lens to get a high quality lower magnification image. EG a 135mm lens gives 135/200 = 0.675x the magnification.
Buying used is risky, a lot seem to get damaged without showing any external sign.
J'espère que c'est le genre de conseil que vous cherchiez!
Chris R
- enricosavazzi
- Posts: 1478
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 2:41 pm
- Location: Västerås, Sweden
- Contact:
Many users of this forum use the Mitutoyo M Plan Apo series. There are good reason for not using other series (M Plan Apo HR, M Plan Apo SL, M Plan Apo NUV, M Plan UV, or any of the several M Plan (Apo) NIR series).bluefish wrote:Thank you for your answer but about the many types of lenses, what are the most appropriate for the macro?
--ES
Good evening
Yes that's exactly the answer I was waiting for and I thank you for it.
Currently I am only equipped with lenses of LT 160, some PLANAPO on a microscope Zeiss universal therefore unusable because of their WD too short. Macro I use a ULWD 40 and ULWD 20 but not APO.
I do interesting things but the quality does not reach the one I see in the pictures on this site.
I will also post some photos later.
Yes that's exactly the answer I was waiting for and I thank you for it.
Currently I am only equipped with lenses of LT 160, some PLANAPO on a microscope Zeiss universal therefore unusable because of their WD too short. Macro I use a ULWD 40 and ULWD 20 but not APO.
I do interesting things but the quality does not reach the one I see in the pictures on this site.
I will also post some photos later.
retired from the wine and vine, amateur of macro photography and who speaks English with difficulty. Mr Google will help me. Thank you for your indulgence.