www.photomacrography.net :: View topic - Chironomid (non-biting) midge
www.photomacrography.net Forum Index
An online community dedicated to the practices of photomacrography, close-up and macro photography, and photomicrography.
Photomacrography Front Page Amateurmicrography Front Page
Old Forums/Galleries
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Chironomid (non-biting) midge

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.photomacrography.net Forum Index -> Macro and Close-up Archives
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Charles Krebs



Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 5762
Location: Issaquah, WA USA

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 3:34 pm    Post subject: Chironomid (non-biting) midge Reply with quote

About the size of a mosquito (just a tad bigger) this chironomid midge has amazing antennae, and a wonderful "wrap around" eye.

Nikon D200. Tominon 17mm f4 lens. 32 image stack
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Ken Ramos



Joined: 27 Jul 2006
Posts: 6997
Location: lat=35.4005&lon=-81.9841

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 3:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Must say, you got a great angle on this Charlie. I have never seen a compound eye that wraps around the head like that. Wonderful image! Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MacroLuv



Joined: 28 Aug 2006
Posts: 1964
Location: Croatia

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 4:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow! Almost unreal. Incredible lighting! Very Happy Applause
_________________
The meaning of beauty is in sharing with others.

P.S.
Noticing of my "a" and "the" and other grammar
errors are welcome. Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Erland R.N.



Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 335
Location: Kolding, Denmark

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 6:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Now that is a plain awesome photo. These stacks are really something special. I have seen other insects, where the eyes are kind of sweeped around the base of the antennaes. The stand out great in the photo.

cheers
Erland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Carl_Constantine



Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 304
Location: Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

An Ethereal glow to him. I assume this is a stack. Wonderful picture Charles. You guys make me jealous for sure Razz
_________________
Carl B. Constantine
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
beetleman



Joined: 04 Aug 2006
Posts: 3578
Location: Southern New Hampshire USA

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 10:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think this is one even the ladies will agree is very beautiful for an insect.
_________________
Take Nothing but Pictures--Leave Nothing but Footprints.
Doug Breda
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
georgedingwall



Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 207
Location: Invergordon, Scotland

PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 6:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Charlie,

I nearly fell of my chair when I saw this image. It's simply stunning.

I only hope that I can make an image as good as this one day.

How did you manage to mount the specimen without damaging the antenae Question They look so fragile.

Great image, thanks.
_________________
George Dingwall

Invergordon, Scotland

http://www.georgedingwall.co.uk/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Jody Melanson



Joined: 10 Aug 2006
Posts: 130
Location: Ontario, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 9:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow! Spectacular! Shocked
_________________
Capturer of God's Creations.

There is a fine line between a hobby and mental illness.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Saul



Joined: 31 Jan 2011
Posts: 914
Location: Naperville, IL USA

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2011 2:02 pm    Post subject: Tominon 17mm Reply with quote

Hi Charles ,
I have Nikon CFI 160 10x and El-Nikkor 50 2.8 N.
Is Tominon better than these ?
Thanks,
Saul
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Charles Krebs



Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 5762
Location: Issaquah, WA USA

PostPosted: Thu May 19, 2011 3:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Saul,
Quote:
I have Nikon CFI 160 10x and El-Nikkor 50 2.8 N.
Is Tominon better than these ?


Better?...in a word.. no. As you can see this was done about 4 1/2 years ago and I was curious to try stacking with some of the lenses I had accumulated over the years.

The Tominon 17/4 would be "competing" more with the 10X microscope objective. (The 50/2.8 El-Nikkor really serves a different magnification range). As you can see it is capable of very fine results, but its primary drawback is the f4 maximum aperture. So when it is cranked out to about 10X (for this shot it is somewhat less) the effective aperture is in the f45 range. Here you will see significantly more resolution loss due to diffraction than with a 10/0.25 objective (which is probably closer to effective f22 at 10:1).

At lower magnifications it might be worth trying if you can get a really good deal on buying one. As I recall, initially it presented some really significant flare issues until I worked on the interior surfaces of the adapters I used in order to to eliminate reflective surfaces. (But that is something that should be done with any set-up... just got a bit lazy. Just seemed a bit more crucial in order to to get best results with this optic).
_________________
http://www.krebsmicro.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Saul



Joined: 31 Jan 2011
Posts: 914
Location: Naperville, IL USA

PostPosted: Fri May 20, 2011 6:30 am    Post subject: Tominon Reply with quote

Hi Charles,
Thank you for your extremally fast reply !
Already bought - price was too good Sad
What is the best range to shoot with Tominon ? I found info - around 20x.
Thanks
Saul
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Charles Krebs



Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 5762
Location: Issaquah, WA USA

PostPosted: Sat May 21, 2011 1:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Saul,
I don't know what magnifications Polaroid suggested (10-34X based on this page: http://www.macrolenses.de/objektive.php?lang ). But you need to remember that this was used on their stands that were primarily intended for use with the 4x5" format (and naturally no image "stacking"). So the large format could stand smaller effective f-stops, and since everything was "one-shot" (no stacking for DOF purposes) there was additional room for some compromise of resolution in order to get a little more DOF.

With a DSLR anything over about 7X (with a 24X36mm sensor) and about 5X with an APS-C sized sensor are probably better done with a lens that can provide good quality at an aperture larger than f4.
_________________
http://www.krebsmicro.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Saul



Joined: 31 Jan 2011
Posts: 914
Location: Naperville, IL USA

PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 7:13 am    Post subject: Tominon 17mm Reply with quote

Hi Charles,

Got Tominon, but strange thing-tried on the camera with no bellows/rings, with flash. I'm getting white blurred spot (unfocused) at the center of the frame, more pronounced on the darker objects, looks like some kind of flare. Glass is clean, camera is Nikon D7000. Same is without flash-less visible, but still here. Could it be flare ? Inner black coating of this lens is not perfect...
Any ideas from your experience with this lens ?

Thank you very much,

Saul
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Charles Krebs



Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 5762
Location: Issaquah, WA USA

PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 11:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Saul,

Remember my earlier post...
Quote:
As I recall, initially it presented some really significant flare issues until I worked on the interior surfaces of the adapters I used in order to to eliminate reflective surfaces


You need to really check out the inner surfaces of any tubes and adapters used. You should also avoid any strong light entering the front of the lens from outside of the subject area. I seem to remember that the rear element had a very flat and/or unusually colored coating that didn't seem to help matters in the flare department either.
_________________
http://www.krebsmicro.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
abpho



Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 1423
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Amazing stuff.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.photomacrography.net Forum Index -> Macro and Close-up Archives All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group