Symptoms of Movement?
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
-
- Posts: 870
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:01 pm
- Location: North Olmsted, Ohio, U.S.A.
Symptoms of Movement?
I just shot this stack of 114 shot with:
Canon T4i, manual 1/250, ISO 100
Minolta 50mm manual reversed onto two sets of extension tubes
two Amazonbasics manual flashes set to 1/32 power
Wemacro set to 88um
stacked with Zerene
What are those black streaks surrounding the subject? Are those artifacts caused by movement?
Something common to Pmax in Zerene?
Given my somewhat rudimentary equipment, I'm relatively happy with the results. However, this isn't the first time I've seen these streaks.
What can I do to eliminate them?
Edit: It'd be helpful to attach the picture...
Canon T4i, manual 1/250, ISO 100
Minolta 50mm manual reversed onto two sets of extension tubes
two Amazonbasics manual flashes set to 1/32 power
Wemacro set to 88um
stacked with Zerene
What are those black streaks surrounding the subject? Are those artifacts caused by movement?
Something common to Pmax in Zerene?
Given my somewhat rudimentary equipment, I'm relatively happy with the results. However, this isn't the first time I've seen these streaks.
What can I do to eliminate them?
Edit: It'd be helpful to attach the picture...
They are dust trails: the sensor has very small dust particles (you must be able to see them at each individual frame) and because the field of view -and magnification- changes during focus stacking to maintain the subject proportions the software adjusts the frame size and so the position of the dust spots.
How to avoid them?
- clean the sensor (although it's very difficult to have it perfectly clean)
- use a telecentric lens that doesn't change magnification with the distance.
(there is some small movement, if not the lines would look straight, but nothing to worry about)
How to avoid them?
- clean the sensor (although it's very difficult to have it perfectly clean)
- use a telecentric lens that doesn't change magnification with the distance.
(there is some small movement, if not the lines would look straight, but nothing to worry about)
Pau
-
- Posts: 870
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:01 pm
- Location: North Olmsted, Ohio, U.S.A.
Could it be the lens itself?Pau wrote:They are dust trails: the sensor has very small dust particles (you must be able to see them at each individual frame) and because the field of view -and magnification- changes during focus stacking to maintain the subject proportions the software adjusts the frame size and so the position of the dust spots.
How to avoid them?
- clean the sensor (although it's very difficult to have it perfectly clean)
- use a telecentric lens that doesn't change magnification with the distance.
(there is some small movement, if not the lines would look straight, but nothing to worry about)
I don't recall getting those streaks with my Tokina 100mm macro.
That's a very old lens, probably older than some of the people who post here.
I also saw reference on the Zerene website to streaks being caused by changing of the framing of shots, sometimes due to shooting angled downward, which in fact the rail and camera are.
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23626
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
These look far too sharp to be anything on the lens. Usually dirt on the lens will manifest as huge fuzzy blobs, unless you're using something like a fisheye lens with enormous DOF.
If there is a difference from one lens to another, it is probably in the way that image size changes as you step focus. That change is much less with some lenses than others, and less change makes the trails shorter.
The other kind of streaks that you've mentioned are "edge streaks". They look completely different. See slides 83 versus 84 at http://zerenesystems.com/presentations/ ... 151009.pdf . (This is the "Recommended Presentation Slide Set" mentioned at https://zerenesystems.com/cms/stacker/d ... rialsindex .)
--Rik
If there is a difference from one lens to another, it is probably in the way that image size changes as you step focus. That change is much less with some lenses than others, and less change makes the trails shorter.
The other kind of streaks that you've mentioned are "edge streaks". They look completely different. See slides 83 versus 84 at http://zerenesystems.com/presentations/ ... 151009.pdf . (This is the "Recommended Presentation Slide Set" mentioned at https://zerenesystems.com/cms/stacker/d ... rialsindex .)
--Rik
-
- Posts: 870
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:01 pm
- Location: North Olmsted, Ohio, U.S.A.
I'm going to do a manual cleaning after I buy a brushless blower (the only one I have is 30+ years old and has a brush on it.rjlittlefield wrote:These look far too sharp to be anything on the lens. Usually dirt on the lens will manifest as huge fuzzy blobs, unless you're using something like a fisheye lens with enormous DOF.
If there is a difference from one lens to another, it is probably in the way that image size changes as you step focus. That change is much less with some lenses than others, and less change makes the trails shorter.
The other kind of streaks that you've mentioned are "edge streaks". They look completely different. See slides 83 versus 84 at http://zerenesystems.com/presentations/ ... 151009.pdf . (This is the "Recommended Presentation Slide Set" mentioned at https://zerenesystems.com/cms/stacker/d ... rialsindex .)
--Rik
After that, I may have to take in to be cleaned. Not sure where to do that in NE Ohio...
If my experience is any guide, skip the "professional" cleanings--the camera shops whose work I've seen aren't picky enough for a macro photographer. The small apertures we use show dust particles too tiny for most professional shops to bother with.Deanimator wrote:After that, I may have to take in to be cleaned. Not sure where to do that in NE Ohio...
For me, cleaning a sensor requires a low-powered stereomicroscope and oblique light (sensor loupes do not show all the small dust). I start and finish with a blower, first to remove lightly-adhering particles, and later to remove cleaning fibers. In between, use of some "wet" cleaning method is nearly always necessary, to remove sticky particles such as skin flakes.
--Chris S.
-
- Posts: 870
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:01 pm
- Location: North Olmsted, Ohio, U.S.A.
After learning [yet again] that you can't get serious photo gear and accessories in NE Ohio, I ordered a blower and wet cleaning tools early this morning after I got home from work. I got the stuff recommended by quirky YouTube personality Theoria Apophasis.Chris S. wrote:If my experience is any guide, skip the "professional" cleanings--the camera shops whose work I've seen aren't picky enough for a macro photographer. The small apertures we use show dust particles too tiny for most professional shops to bother with.Deanimator wrote:After that, I may have to take in to be cleaned. Not sure where to do that in NE Ohio...
For me, cleaning a sensor requires a low-powered stereomicroscope and oblique light (sensor loupes do not show all the small dust). I start and finish with a blower, first to remove lightly-adhering particles, and later to remove cleaning fibers. In between, use of some "wet" cleaning method is nearly always necessary, to remove sticky particles such as skin flakes.
--Chris S.
Unfortunately, none of the stuff is getting here before the 11th, so I'll just have to soldier on as-is, unless I somehow stumble across at least a blower at Dodd or Pixel Connection.
-
- Posts: 870
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:01 pm
- Location: North Olmsted, Ohio, U.S.A.
How did your cleaning go, Deanimator? If it's anything like my first time cleaning a DSLR sensor, the answer will be "frustrating." There will be some tough spots that stubbornly resist a wide swab, which upon removing can cause a wider mess. And sometimes, grease seems to appear from nowhere during the cleaning. (New cameras sometimes have greasy gunk around the sensor, and the first cleaning can smear this onto the sensor; if this happens to you, just keep cleaning with additional swabs--once you get all this peripheral grease off, it should be gone forever.) Rest assured, it gets easier.
I like his recommendation for sensor swabs well enough. Also agree with him that you'll want PEC pads or similar for additional cleaning. I lash slices of PEC pads over pencil erasers for spot cleaning. (And also use PEC pads on lenses.)
I disagree with him (and just about everyone else) on insisting on Eclipse cleaning fluid, which is just alcohol plus marketing. In my experience, any common alcohol works as well--including vodka, rubbing alcohol, and hardware-store methanol.
--Chris S.
"Quirky" is a very polite word for this personality!Deanimator wrote:I got the stuff recommended by quirky YouTube personality Theoria Apophasis.
I like his recommendation for sensor swabs well enough. Also agree with him that you'll want PEC pads or similar for additional cleaning. I lash slices of PEC pads over pencil erasers for spot cleaning. (And also use PEC pads on lenses.)
I disagree with him (and just about everyone else) on insisting on Eclipse cleaning fluid, which is just alcohol plus marketing. In my experience, any common alcohol works as well--including vodka, rubbing alcohol, and hardware-store methanol.
--Chris S.
-
- Posts: 870
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:01 pm
- Location: North Olmsted, Ohio, U.S.A.
-
- Posts: 870
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:01 pm
- Location: North Olmsted, Ohio, U.S.A.
-
- Posts: 870
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:01 pm
- Location: North Olmsted, Ohio, U.S.A.
I did a dust detection image... and found nothing. Not sure why.
I then did a couple of cleaning cycles with the camera mechanism.
I then blew the sensor area out with a hand blower.
I'm doing a stack now to see what happens.
The subject is [almost] exactly as it was for the posted picture, so changes should be readily apparent.
I then did a couple of cleaning cycles with the camera mechanism.
I then blew the sensor area out with a hand blower.
I'm doing a stack now to see what happens.
The subject is [almost] exactly as it was for the posted picture, so changes should be readily apparent.
-
- Posts: 870
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:01 pm
- Location: North Olmsted, Ohio, U.S.A.
Streaks are still there, so on to wet cleaning.
Interestingly they don't initially appear in Zerene, only appearing part way through the stack.
It'll have to wait until tomorrow morning after I get home from work.
Interesting that I didn't see anything when doing the recommended test image for dust...
Interestingly they don't initially appear in Zerene, only appearing part way through the stack.
It'll have to wait until tomorrow morning after I get home from work.
Interesting that I didn't see anything when doing the recommended test image for dust...