Diatom Threw Slide Mix
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
-
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2016 5:46 am
Diatom Threw Slide Mix
Hello,
her are some pics from a recent threw slide set.
All credits for the slides go to Anne.
All images were taken with the Olympus SPlan Apo 60x/1.4, green filtration, NFK 3.3x and Nikon D800, processing in RawTherapee, stacked in Zerene and polished in Photoshop.
1:
Pinnularia neomajor, ~170µm
Areolae, crop from the image above, pore distance between 170 - 190nm
Rhopalodia spec., ~180µm
Crop from the image above
A mandala
And a really small one
Thanks for looking,
Michael
her are some pics from a recent threw slide set.
All credits for the slides go to Anne.
All images were taken with the Olympus SPlan Apo 60x/1.4, green filtration, NFK 3.3x and Nikon D800, processing in RawTherapee, stacked in Zerene and polished in Photoshop.
1:
Pinnularia neomajor, ~170µm
Areolae, crop from the image above, pore distance between 170 - 190nm
Rhopalodia spec., ~180µm
Crop from the image above
A mandala
And a really small one
Thanks for looking,
Michael
-
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2016 5:46 am
Thanks for your answers!
It's not really "plain" transmitted light. A little bit oblique, and I was playing with the crossed polarizers to achieve maximum detail/contrast. If you don't mind ending up with monochrome images, green light is better in terms of flaring and resolution than just using the green channel of a "white" light image. Due to interference effects, other wavelengths also tend to creep into the green channel, so the result with white light is usually a bit inferior, depends on the circumstances. For max resolution, it would be best to use 365 nm UV light and a modded DSLR and according filtration.
Best regards,
Michael
It's not really "plain" transmitted light. A little bit oblique, and I was playing with the crossed polarizers to achieve maximum detail/contrast. If you don't mind ending up with monochrome images, green light is better in terms of flaring and resolution than just using the green channel of a "white" light image. Due to interference effects, other wavelengths also tend to creep into the green channel, so the result with white light is usually a bit inferior, depends on the circumstances. For max resolution, it would be best to use 365 nm UV light and a modded DSLR and according filtration.
Best regards,
Michael
- carlos.uruguay
- Posts: 5358
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:05 pm
- Location: Uruguay - Montevideo - America del Sur
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 5090
- Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:31 pm
- Cactusdave
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:40 pm
- Location: Bromley, Kent, UK
-
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2016 5:46 am
-
- Posts: 1976
- Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:16 am
- Location: Bigfork, Montana
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2016 5:46 am
Thanks again for your comments,
here are another two:
Cymatopleura elliptica var hibernica (W. Smith) Van Heurck 1896
Diploneis alpina Meister
Thanks for looking!
Best regards,
Michael
Edit: Thanks to the help of the diatom-experts on the german microscopy-forum, i was able to add the identification
here are another two:
Cymatopleura elliptica var hibernica (W. Smith) Van Heurck 1896
Diploneis alpina Meister
Thanks for looking!
Best regards,
Michael
Edit: Thanks to the help of the diatom-experts on the german microscopy-forum, i was able to add the identification
Last edited by sushidelic on Wed Mar 29, 2017 7:19 am, edited 1 time in total.