A good wasp. Dead!

Images taken in a controlled environment or with a posed subject. All subject types.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

Beatsy
Posts: 2132
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2013 3:10 am
Location: Malvern, UK

A good wasp. Dead!

Post by Beatsy »

A long dead wasp is not an ideal subject, but I posted this because of how well the hairs came out. Best ever for me!

I find furry parts usually dissolve into a hazy mush (in places) when stacked. I learnt to avoid overlapping areas with widely different focal depths (to stop that blurred halo effect on the further-away feature). And extra side-lighting often delineates fine edges better in a deep stack (e.g. hairs). But I did little different to my usual approach here and the hairs came out s-o-o-o well (IMO). Wish they would always come out this clear!

Done with 5x mitty, full frame, pmax stack, no retouching. Shift x,y and scaling turned on (as I always do for low-mag, full-depth stacks). Stacked every other frame with 50% reduction in pre-process (don't often do that). 170 frames used. Right edge cropped off to hide an unsightly ent pin.

As I said, it's a bit of a mystery why the hairs rendered so well in this one. But the moon is in it's waxing gibbous phase - perhaps that's why :)

Image

Pitufo
Posts: 260
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2015 4:32 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Pitufo »

That is a very hirsute wasp. Great result.

abpho
Posts: 1524
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:11 pm
Location: Earth

Post by abpho »

Please share if you ever figure this out. :)
I'm in Canada! Isn't that weird?

Lou Jost
Posts: 5987
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2015 7:03 am
Location: Ecuador
Contact:

Post by Lou Jost »

It is also impressively free of dust. Whatever is going on there, I hope it lasts for you!

ChrisR
Site Admin
Posts: 8671
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 3:58 am
Location: Near London, UK

Post by ChrisR »

Could it be that the wasp is different - particularly dry, say?

Is this with your led panel light?

Can you see anything different on a single frame, maybe?
Chris R

Pizzazz
Posts: 586
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2013 7:39 pm

Post by Pizzazz »

Beatsy


OK. That is IT!!!

YOU need to hold a seminar and teach us on how you get all of these fine
results!

Humph!!!

At least for me, I am trying to keep up with you and I am getting tired!!!!

As usual, excellent work.


Mike

GaryB
Posts: 521
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2016 12:18 pm

Post by GaryB »

My wife had hair just like that in the 80's

Excellent picture!

Beatsy
Posts: 2132
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2013 3:10 am
Location: Malvern, UK

Post by Beatsy »

ChrisR wrote:Could it be that the wasp is different - particularly dry, say? Is this with your led panel light? Can you see anything different on a single frame, maybe?
I don't think the condition of the subject is much of a factor, except that the hairs may be sparser and thicker than on (say) a bee or moth etc.

I used Schott goosenecks for this one (at 3000k) to set a near-spotlight on one side and diffuse light on the other side (and top). Three quarters of a ping pong ball as diffuser. I got "mushy hair" with this setup before though so pretty sure that's not a major factor.

Nope - single frames looked "normal" as far as I could tell. I'm wondering if the extra spacing and 50% reduction is a factor. Perhaps I accidentally found an optimum step size for the subject (not dictated by objective DoF with down-sampling doing something "good" too)? I will find another furry critter that exhibits the "mush factor" and try several stacks with different spacings (keeping everything else the same). I'll report back in the techniques section if anything comes of it...

ChrisR
Site Admin
Posts: 8671
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 3:58 am
Location: Near London, UK

Post by ChrisR »

The only best way I know is to work at the smallest NA you can, subject to getting just enough resolution for display, after strong & clever sharpenig.

No iris involved at all?
Chris R

Beatsy
Posts: 2132
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2013 3:10 am
Location: Malvern, UK

Post by Beatsy »

Update: well, I started testing with the most "stack unfriendly" critter I could find (a hairy bee) but couldn't get the hairs to turn to "mush" with any reasonable settings. All went OK.

So I still don't know what I changed to improve things, perhaps several different factors. It's working well though so I've lost any motivation to do lots of deep test stacks to find out precisely what caused the problem in the first place. I'm sure I'll run into again in the course of normal stacking, so I'll investigate then.

Bee - 5x Mitty, 177-image stack.

Image

Pau
Site Admin
Posts: 6064
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:57 am
Location: Valencia, Spain

Post by Pau »

Update: well, I started testing with the most "stack unfriendly" critter I could find (a hairy bee) but couldn't get the hairs to turn to "mush" with any reasonable settings. All went OK.
You must be the luckiest macrophotographer in the Universe :shock: :lol:
Pau

Beatsy
Posts: 2132
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2013 3:10 am
Location: Malvern, UK

Post by Beatsy »

Haha - this is where I say "it seems the more I practice, the luckier I get" :D

MacroLab3D
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:40 am
Location: Ukraine

Post by MacroLab3D »

Beatsy, you should freeze this moment, record everything on video in your room, all around and write all camera and software parameters on paper. This is too much important incident. You need to investigate it like Holmes.

AMAZING

I am waiting for results like crazy. PLEASE!

ChrisR
Site Admin
Posts: 8671
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 3:58 am
Location: Near London, UK

Post by ChrisR »

A snap of the setup/pp balls would be interesting to see..
Image
Chris R

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic