coscinodiscus(?)
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
-
- Posts: 1954
- Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:16 am
- Location: Bigfork, Montana
- Contact:
coscinodiscus(?)
Just guessing on this diatom. Anyone happen to know? Perhaps a link. I wasn't able to find it in the database I was looking at.
-JW:
-JW:
Last edited by Smokedaddy on Wed Feb 15, 2017 8:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Charles Krebs
- Posts: 5865
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
- Location: Issaquah, WA USA
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1954
- Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:16 am
- Location: Bigfork, Montana
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1954
- Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:16 am
- Location: Bigfork, Montana
- Contact:
Another diatoms today. <g> I'm not sure how to capture the 'sphere' stacking wise. Either the objective won't resolve it properly, or I need to change some settings in Zerene. I haven't a clue how to stack any smaller increments if that's the problem. In any case at least you get the illusion of it being a sphere even though it gets less sharp as you reach the circumference.
-JW:
-JW:
Last edited by Smokedaddy on Wed Feb 15, 2017 3:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23564
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
If depth of mountant is the problem, then you might be able to work around it by pausing the shoot midway and re-adjusting the correction collar.
There's no guarantee this will work, however. Features along the periphery of a sphere may be seen by only about half of the objective's aperture, while the other half of the aperture sees OOF foreground. This effect can cut contrast pretty badly. It's another version of the issue diagrammed at http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/v ... 042#135042 .
--Rik
There's no guarantee this will work, however. Features along the periphery of a sphere may be seen by only about half of the objective's aperture, while the other half of the aperture sees OOF foreground. This effect can cut contrast pretty badly. It's another version of the issue diagrammed at http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/v ... 042#135042 .
Check your source images. If source is sharp, then it make sense to think about changing settings in Zerene. If source is not sharp, Zerene cannot fix the problem.Either the objective won't resolve it properly, or I need to change some settings in Zerene.
--Rik
-
- Posts: 1954
- Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:16 am
- Location: Bigfork, Montana
- Contact:
Thanks for the replies. On another note, has anyone tried this plugin with ImageJ?
http://bigwww.epfl.ch/deconvolution/deconvolutionlab2/
-JW:
http://bigwww.epfl.ch/deconvolution/deconvolutionlab2/
-JW:
-
- Posts: 1954
- Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:16 am
- Location: Bigfork, Montana
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1954
- Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:16 am
- Location: Bigfork, Montana
- Contact:
Here's another I finished today.
-JW:
-JW:
Last edited by Smokedaddy on Thu Feb 16, 2017 9:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
- carlos.uruguay
- Posts: 5358
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:05 pm
- Location: Uruguay - Montevideo - America del Sur
- Contact:
- Cactusdave
- Posts: 1631
- Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:40 pm
- Location: Bromley, Kent, UK
-
- Posts: 1954
- Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:16 am
- Location: Bigfork, Montana
- Contact:
Thanks to you! I'm having a blast. I can spend 'weeks' on these puppies. I've photographed several dozen already, just haven't posted them. Didn't want to bore anyone. <g> I can't wait to figure this all out and buy a couple high-end objectives.Cactusdave wrote:Delighted to see those diatom slides being put to such productive use. You are learning fast.
Regards,
-JW: