Crab spider II. Up close with 65mm MP-E

[Charles Krebs]

This afternoon I looked for the crab spider I had photographed and posted yesterday, and found it close to where it had been left off. The air was dead calm so I knew I would be able to take some long exposures. I coaxed the spider onto a white daisy and got out the Canon 65 MP-E. These three images were made using "natural" light (in the shade), with exposures of about 1.6 second at a "marked" f8. The spider would sometimes stay motionless in the same position long enough for me to shoot several exposures changing the focus slightly (to get extended DOF). The top two images are each composed of 3 frames combined in Helicon Focus. The bottom is 5 frames. (The bottom image is with the MP-E set at 5:1, the closest it will go. The other two are probably about 3.5 or 4:1.).

After my brief photo session I placed the spider back on the lavender where I had initially found it. When I checked back a short time later is had already caught its next meal... another honeybee!

[rjlittlefield]

Wow! A virtuoso display of aesthetic beauty and technical prowess.

1.6 seconds per frame with a live specimen outside.

This is just awesome, Charlie. "Crab spider with pollen" ?

--Rik

[Mike B in OKlahoma]

Not only 1.6 second exposures with a wild specimen, but STACKED groups of 3 to 5 shots! Wow.
_________________
Mike Broderick
Oklahoma City, OK, USA

Constructive critiques of my pictures, and reposts in this forum for purposes of critique are welcome

"I must obey the inscrutable exhortations of my soul....My mandate includes weird bugs."
--Calvin

[beetleman]

Simply incredible Charles. #3 is awesome
_________________
Take Nothing but Pictures--Leave Nothing but Footprints.
Doug Breda

[Ken Ramos]

Beautiful as usual Charlie. I am assuming that the two red eyes are actually the primary eyes of the spider while the rest are nothing more than mere ocelli.
_________________
Ken Ramos
Rutherford Co., Western North Carolina

"Social isolate?"

[DaveW]

"I am assuming that the two red eyes are actually the primary eyes of the spider while the rest are nothing more than mere ocelli"

Nah, it's red eye from flash on camera !

Seriously, great shots, photostacking of a live subject is really pushing the boundaries. Good job spiders don't blink. Or do they?

DaveW

[Charles Krebs]

Those two eyes were interesting. No flash was used. While taking the photos it was apparent that the spider could "rotate" or ""move" something under the surface that made the eye appear either red, black, or partially red/black when viewed from the same position. These two enlarged (consecutive) frames show what I mean. (They are at slightly different focus points so try to ignore the softness). Of particular interest is the "lower" red eye. If you look at about the 2:30 to 3 o'clock position off to the side of the eye socket you can see that it is darker in the right frame. I could observe this darker section moving about below the surface and as it moved about the eye would show various stages of red, black, and "partial". I didn't notice this with the other eyes.

Here is a quote from a web page dealing with jumping spiders. While it is a different species, and the two "AMEs" are much larger, perhaps something similar to what is described occurs with the crab spider.

From: http://tolweb.org/accessory/Jumping_Spider_Vision?acc_id=1946

[Ken Ramos]

We are still getting "Infernal Sevice Errors!"

Pretty neat there Charlie, thanks. I suppose that explains the eye thing pretty much, doesn't it? So if, I am assuming, all eight of them are looking at you then they might all be red and that none of them are quite like ocelli, of which I thought six of them were. That's what I get for thinking. Good info, thanks again
_________________
Ken Ramos
Rutherford Co., Western North Carolina

"Social isolate?"

[Walter Piorkowski]

Truly beautiful Charles. What stunning backgrounds for this subject.
Walt