Achieving Black Backgrounds in Macro Photos...

A forum to ask questions, post setups, and generally discuss anything having to do with photomacrography and photomicroscopy.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 23621
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Post by rjlittlefield »

Chris S. wrote:Second is the context in which the author said ...
Indeed.

A very wise friend of mine once counseled me that "Almost everything you read on the Internet is true. The question is, exactly what is it true about?"

I think we're getting close to having figured that out in this case.

--Rik

stonewhite
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun May 17, 2015 9:59 pm

a wealth of information...

Post by stonewhite »

sincere thanks to you both, Chris and Rik, for pursuing this with me...looking forward to adopting Blake's protocol, too!

Best,

Dean Taylor

Charles Krebs
Posts: 5865
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Contact:

Post by Charles Krebs »

I am certain that some really like the stark black background... "different strokes" and all that... (and in microscopy we certainly use darkfield a lot).

What really bothers me about some of the examples in the links in this thread is the very significant tonal blending where the dark subject details and structures tend to disappear into the dark background. (Look at them again with that in mind). If you like this basic lighting approach but the subject is such that this "tonal blending" prevents you from discerning the outer edges of a structure or fine detail along the periphery you can add some back-light to accentuate this detail. It can be very subtle or very emphatic depending on your taste, but is usually enhances the image, often dramatically.

Obviously this is much easier to do in a controlled indoor shot. But back in the "film days" :roll: , when I chased more critters around outside, I would sometimes use a slaved flash behind the subject. If I wanted the "darkfield" look I would point it at the subject from the rear (watch out for flare, block it from hitting the lens directly). If I wanted to avoid the black background it could be positioned to illuminate the background of the picture that would otherwise go to black due to the light fall-off.

Here is a old image (an early stack form 2005), primarily front illuminated. Not the greatest shot, but I have indicated with blue arrows portions that would likely have blended into the black background had I not added a rear light to "separate" these areas form the background.

Image

rjlittlefield
Site Admin
Posts: 23621
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
Contact:

Re: a wealth of information...

Post by rjlittlefield »

stonewhite wrote:sincere thanks to you both, Chris and Rik, for pursuing this with me...looking forward to adopting Blake's protocol, too!
You're very welcome. I learned from the experience also.

But now you've raised my curiosity again. What is "Blake's protocol", and who is Blake? I can't find that name on any of the pages we've been discussing. :?

--Rik

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic