Craig Gerard wrote:My question regarding magnification was of a more fundamental nature and an attempt to address an earlier enquiry regarding goniometers with a small range of movement compared to a set with a larger range of movement, for e.g. if using a 20X objective would an adjustment to either 'arc' translate to a larger visible displacement within the FOV as opposed to the same adjustment when using a 2X objective? The answer would appear to be obvious but I wanted to clarify.
I'm still not sure I understand the question, but let me try several answers.
1. Maybe the question relates to undesired lateral motion that is caused by not having the subject exactly at center.
In this case the lateral motion
as measured in mm is
1) proportional to the subject distance above or below center, and
2) proportional to the angle, and
3) independent of the size or range of the goniometer.
As a fraction of field width, the lateral motion is also proportional to the magnification, so visually it will be 10 times as bad at 20X as it is at 2X.
2. Maybe the question relates to the effect of angle on stack depth. That is, if a 5 degree shift doubles the depth of a stack at 2X, what does it do at 20X? The answer here is that it's about the same at both magnifications, doubling the depth at 20X also. The change in depth
measured in mm will change less at 20X because of the smaller FOV, but it will be the same
as a fraction of FOV.
Does something in here answer your question?
--Rik