www.photomacrography.net :: View topic - ID help pretty please?!
www.photomacrography.net Forum Index
An online community devoted to the practices of photomacrography, amateur microscopy, and photomicrography.
Photomacrography Front Page Amateurmicrography Front Page
Old Forums/Galleries
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
ID help pretty please?!

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.photomacrography.net Forum Index -> Photography Through the Microscope
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
sammi



Joined: 16 May 2011
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:02 am    Post subject: ID help pretty please?! Reply with quote

Hello,
I've been trying my hand at ID-ing these guys but am having some trouble. The majority of books I can get my hands on are extremely outdated with (lovely) hand drawings, so although pretty helpful, I'm still falling short.

Does anyone know what any of these are?

Thank-you!











Smile Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rjlittlefield
Site Admin


Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 12565
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

#1 has the general layout of a rotifer, but it seems awfully small given that scale bar.

#3 looks like a mite of some sort.

The others, I don't have the foggiest idea.

What's the specimen prep on these?

--Rik
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
sammi



Joined: 16 May 2011
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks!
These are marine biofilm samples (grown on plastic), that have just been ethanol dehydrated and critical point dried. Although it's too late now (already prepared all my samples), would you have a suggestion for a better prep?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
discomorphella



Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Posts: 288
Location: NW USA

PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Sammi--

Can't help you right away with IDs, but I could offer you some SEM suggestions. The EtOH appears to be serving as your fixative as well as dehydrating your specimen; it may be better to fix the films in some formaldehyde first, typically 4% paraformaldehyde, you can find the recipe in numerous places. Then you can dehydrate and dry it. From the image tags, it looks like you are using 10 kV accelerating voltage, and a working distance of approx. 8 to 9 mm. You'll get better imaging if you try to get a smaller WD, say 3- 4 mm or so. Additionally, you probably don't need 10 kV, although I don't know what make of SEM you are using, I bet 3 kV would be fine. What beam current are you running at? At the comparatively low magnifications you are using charging is not a big issue, but I think you may see some image improvement if you lightly coat your samples with some Au or Au/Pd or Rh. Not a lot, maybe 25 to 50A or so, just enough to get a light film of metal (about 10 mA for 10s on my sputter coater for example). It will be very helpful if you plan on going to higher magnification since the plastic films are good insulators.

Hope this helps.

David
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.photomacrography.net Forum Index -> Photography Through the Microscope All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group