Bellows and microscope objectives

Have questions about the equipment used for macro- or micro- photography? Post those questions in this forum.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

gypsey
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:39 am
Location: South Africa

Bellows and microscope objectives

Post by gypsey »

When referring to the tube length 160/210 of a microscope objective used on a bellows, can someone tell me the location of the start and end points to achieve the correct tube length.

Thanks
gypsey

AndrewC
Posts: 1436
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:05 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by AndrewC »

rgds, Andrew

"Is that an accurate dictionary ? Charlie Eppes

gypsey
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:39 am
Location: South Africa

Post by gypsey »

Thanks for the link Andrew, but it doesn't answer my question unless one can read sensor instead of eyepiece when using bellows.

Regards
gypsey

realjax
Posts: 138
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 12:22 pm
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Post by realjax »

>Thus an objective designed for a "160 mm tube" is actually designed for 150 mm from shoulder_above_the_mounting_threads to the sensor.

Doesn't this answer your question?
Jacco

Craig Gerard
Posts: 2877
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 1:51 am
Location: Australia

Post by Craig Gerard »

gypsey,

The 'end' point is the DSLR sensor or SLR film plane. The location of that varies and will depend upon the camera you are using.

The 'start' point... I need to have that clarified myself. I had assumed it was where the objective thread meets the objective barrel?

The bellows is used to 'fill in the gap' between the start and end points to provide the correct tube length/extension.
The bellows fittings (and any additonal extension, such as an RMS cone adapter) are also calculated into that 'gap' to arrive at the appropriate extension.

Once you have taken into account the matters listed above, you will find that that actual bellows extension is quite minimal.

/160 requires 150mm extension between objective 'shoulder' and sensor
/210 requires 200mm extension between objective 'shoulder' and sensor.

We need a diagram here :)


Craig
To use a classic quote from 'Antz' - "I almost know exactly what I'm doing!"

gypsey
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:39 am
Location: South Africa

Post by gypsey »

Thanks to everyone, for all practical purposes I think the question has been answered, summed up by Craig, that when a microscope objective is used with a bellows, the optimum results will be obtained with a total measurement of 150/200 between the 'shoulder' and the sensor.

Regards
gypsey

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic