T-mount cap / blank ?

Have questions about the equipment used for macro- or micro- photography? Post those questions in this forum.

Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau

Charles Krebs
Posts: 5865
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
Contact:

Post by Charles Krebs »

Chris,
Fluor Apo Plan Epi Dic Ph SULWD 400x/2
:smt017 :smt102 :smt017

BTW... I have both Nikon and Canon "cheap Chinese" extension tubes but they are not the same size. The Canon one's are larger.... 57/0.75 sounds about right. If so, there are some very interesting pieces here that might prove useful with those tubes for special set-ups:
http://www.sciencecenter.net/hutech/bor ... /index.htm

ChrisR
Site Admin
Posts: 8671
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 3:58 am
Location: Near London, UK

Post by ChrisR »

I recently bought Nikon and Olympus 4/3 from "Pixlamb" because he's UK based. But the tubes look the same as those from elsewhere. They seem fine, and for a long length, all screwed together they're more rigid than a stack of bayonet type.
Pehaps a little shiny on the inside, and of course no baffles.

ChrisR
Site Admin
Posts: 8671
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 3:58 am
Location: Near London, UK

Post by ChrisR »

To further hijack Andrew's thread, I made a minor discovery with those Chinese tubes, which is of use to me, though perhaps nobody else...

The 4/3 male end will, just, go into an OM (ie film type camera mount) female extension tube. It doesn't lock of course, but it's quite tight, more so than a body cap. I say "just" because you have to tilt it very slightly first, which isn't at all dramatic, there's absolutely no force involved.

If you're wondering why, it's because I have an OM 65-116 sliding tube which - is another story.

It seems there aren't too many options with adaptors to fit an OM body, but scouring about, there are T mounts, reverse 52/55/58 adaptors, and an EOS to OM body adaptor.

AndrewC
Posts: 1436
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 10:05 am
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by AndrewC »

ChrisR wrote:To further hijack Andrew's thread, ....
.... and all I wanted was just a plain old boring T-mount body cap :smt022

Andrew

ChrisR
Site Admin
Posts: 8671
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2009 3:58 am
Location: Near London, UK

Post by ChrisR »

WHy didn't you say so? Here:

Harold Gough
Posts: 5786
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 2:17 am
Location: Reading, Berkshire, England

Post by Harold Gough »

ChrisR wrote: It seems there aren't too many options with adaptors to fit an OM body, but scouring about, there are T mounts, reverse 52/55/58 adaptors, and an EOS to OM body adaptor.
There is this:

http://www.alanwood.net/photography/oly ... mount.html

Harold
My images are a medium for sharing some of my experiences: they are not me.

Harold Gough
Posts: 5786
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 2:17 am
Location: Reading, Berkshire, England

Post by Harold Gough »

Joseph S. Wisniewski wrote:Seriously, you can often get a servicable male T-thread, a focusing helicoid, an iris, and some lens elements for $5.
See:

http://goto.glocalnet.net/savazzi.net/p ... licoid.htm

Harold
My images are a medium for sharing some of my experiences: they are not me.

g4lab
Posts: 1437
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 11:07 am

Post by g4lab »

Great link Harold, thank you!

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic