Young Stork

MacroLuv · Post by **MacroLuv** » Tue Nov 07, 2006 12:42 pm

Does it count as macro?

(10 x zoom)

Camera model Olympus C-770UZ
Date/time 13.05.2006/12:20:08
Exposure time 1/500 s
F-number f/4
ISO 64
Focal length 47.8 mm

beetleman · Post by **beetleman** » Tue Nov 07, 2006 1:33 pm

I will not debate that but it is a very nice photo Nikola

Ken Ramos · Post by **Ken Ramos** » Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:53 pm

Uh...hmm....I don't think so! However it does qualify as a butt shot.

We'll let it stand for now.

gslaten · Post by **gslaten** » Thu Nov 09, 2006 4:30 pm

I dunno, seems to me it qualifies as a closeup shot, and this is the "Macro and Close-up Photography Gallery". I would sure hate to miss interesting photos like this. Just my opinion.

Gary

MacroLuv · Post by **MacroLuv** » Thu Nov 09, 2006 5:14 pm

Thanks, I'm glade you like it.

Here is the house of which top of the roof you can see on the first photograph. Just to get complete impression.
Stork's nest could weight more then 500 kilograms.
For in the 45 active nests there are sometimes more than 200 storks, while in the seventy or so houses there are no more than 120 local inhabitants, which speaks eloquently of the harmonious relationship between man and nature in the area.

Camera model Olympus SP-320
Date/time 13.05.2006/12:25:59
Exposure time 1/640 s
F-number f/4
ISO 64
Focal length 8 mm

Ken Ramos · Post by **Ken Ramos** » Thu Nov 09, 2006 7:29 pm

Okay guys

, this is all very interesting but we are stretching the limits of the guidelines. This should be moved over to Community.