High style of a maple flower
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23626
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
High style of a maple flower
"In the Spring, a young man's fancy turns to thoughts of...umm..."
Tell me again, what did you say that thing was?!
Well, it's an object of lust, of course! With a bit of anthropomorphism, and only if you happen to be maple pollen.
This is in fact the end of one style of a maple flower, shot very "up close and personal".
You can see a whole flower HERE.
What you're looking at in the image above is less than 1 mm of the very tip of one of those brush-like styles curving up from the flower.
Pretty bizarre structure, eh?
I'm intrigued by those alternating clear and red sections that we can see in the silhouetted fingers. (There must be a technical term for those things. Anybody know what it is?)
From this one picture, it looks like the red and clear might be some sort of immiscible fluids. But I tried watching at 200X whilst I squashed a style between two microscope slides, and it seemed that while there are red and clear fluids, they are completely miscible and are kept separated by some sort of membrane. I have no idea what the red is or what purpose it might serve.
Hope you find this interesting, and I will greatly appreciate any other info you can add!
--Rik
Technical Details: Canon 300D camera, Nikon CF N Plan Achro 10X NA 0.30 objective at 15.6X, 250 mm away from the sensor. Electronic flash, 83 frames in 0.030" (0.00036" average step). Subject size as shown, 0.95 mm square. Stacked with Zerene Stacker, PMax and DMap combined by retouching.
Edit: to mention Zerene Stacker, which had not gone public at the time this post was originally made.
Last edited by rjlittlefield on Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Bruce Williams
- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:41 pm
- Location: Northamptonshire, England
- Contact:
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23626
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Thanks Bruce -- yes, these maple flowers look completely different up close than you'd expect them to!
Laurie, perhaps you're imagining an accretion of gummy worms?
About that orange thing, I'm not completely sure, but I think it's a bit of debris stuck to the backside of the style. I don't see any consistent structure like that at the style tips, but lots of the styles have similar looking fibers at various places. With some care, they can be teased away. I don't know what they are. They look somewhat like hairs from the bracts that surround the flower clusters. I didn't try to clean the styles before shooting them, just shopped around for a section that was oriented to make a decent composition.
You know, I just realized that I've been writing "style" and I actually meant "stigma" -- the receptive part of the pistil.
Oh well, I'll let the mistake stand. Not sure what I'd do with "stigma" in a title, anyway.
--Rik
Laurie, perhaps you're imagining an accretion of gummy worms?
About that orange thing, I'm not completely sure, but I think it's a bit of debris stuck to the backside of the style. I don't see any consistent structure like that at the style tips, but lots of the styles have similar looking fibers at various places. With some care, they can be teased away. I don't know what they are. They look somewhat like hairs from the bracts that surround the flower clusters. I didn't try to clean the styles before shooting them, just shopped around for a section that was oriented to make a decent composition.
You know, I just realized that I've been writing "style" and I actually meant "stigma" -- the receptive part of the pistil.
Oh well, I'll let the mistake stand. Not sure what I'd do with "stigma" in a title, anyway.
--Rik
- Planapo
- Posts: 1583
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:33 am
- Location: Germany, in the United States of Europe
Very interesting and well documented, Rik!
So, I think you could call these gummy-worm-like structures papillae (sing. papilla).
--Betty
I know of the term "papillate stigma" that is in use. I'd presume, that your maple flower here has such one.I'm intrigued by those alternating clear and red sections that we can see in the silhouetted fingers. (There must be a technical term for those things. Anybody know what it is?)
So, I think you could call these gummy-worm-like structures papillae (sing. papilla).
--Betty
Papilla,oh papilla we love you sooo...Planapo wrote: So, I think you could call these gummy-worm-like structures papillae (sing. papilla).
--Betty
(You said sing papilla!;))
Canon 5D and 30D | Canon IXUS 265HS | Cosina 100mm f3.5 macro | EF 75-300 f4.5-5.6 USM III | EF 50 f1.8 II | Slik 88 tripod | Apex Practicioner monocular microscope
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23626
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Cyclops wrote: Papilla,oh papilla we love you sooo...
(You said sing papilla!;))
Thanks, Betty! That sounds like some word I knew a long time ago but couldn't remember. (Too many words, too many words...! )Planapo wrote: So, I think you could call these gummy-worm-like structures papillae (sing. papilla).
--Betty
Any ideas about the red fluid?
--Rik
- Planapo
- Posts: 1583
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 2:33 am
- Location: Germany, in the United States of Europe
Rik wrote:
Not really, but I've found this article which could contain some further information:
http://www.springerlink.com/content/q53 ... bf4d5&pi=2
(As it is an older article, I first have to check if it is as hard copy in our library, and hence can't look into the pdf right now.)
--Betty
Any ideas about the red fluid?
Not really, but I've found this article which could contain some further information:
http://www.springerlink.com/content/q53 ... bf4d5&pi=2
(As it is an older article, I first have to check if it is as hard copy in our library, and hence can't look into the pdf right now.)
--Betty