At least I think it was part of a brown lacewing.
I debated putting this one over in Nature Photography, just because I could make a case for it.
Of course you'd ordinarily see this sort of image here in Technical and Studio.
But honest-to-gosh, this one really does fit under "Images of undisturbed subjects in their natural environment".
How does that work, you ask? Like this:
Yep, sure enough, photographed using natural light, in situ, right where I found it --- stuck to the outside of a window!
I'm presuming that once upon a time this was part of a spider's meal, and now the wing is all that's left, flattened by weather against the glass.
Hope you enjoy!
--Rik
Technical: Canon 300D camera, 80 mm Olympus bellows lens at f/8, 1/10 second, one frame. Photographed through two panes of glass. The block of wood braces the front of the bellows rack against the window. Otherwise the bellows was overhung so far that tripod vibrations were like a flagpole swinging in the breeze.
Remains of a brown lacewing
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23603
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23603
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
- Bruce Williams
- Posts: 1120
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:41 pm
- Location: Northamptonshire, England
- Contact:
Interesting image Rik and good detail too considering it was taken through a double glazed window.
It looks to me as if the bottom edge of the wing (as we look at it) has been folded over. If I'm right and you mentally unfold it, the result is a relatively fat wing that would fit quite well with your Brown Lacewing id .....and of course the venation looks about right too.
Bruce:)
It looks to me as if the bottom edge of the wing (as we look at it) has been folded over. If I'm right and you mentally unfold it, the result is a relatively fat wing that would fit quite well with your Brown Lacewing id .....and of course the venation looks about right too.
Bruce:)
- Cyberspider
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 3:17 pm
- Location: Kehl/Germany
- Contact:
nice shot Rik and a very good reproduction scale . As you wrote/show it is an image for "Nature Photography -- Macro and Close-up"... very nice details!
Something I'm not sure: Should I buy a bellows or should I buy he M-PE 65? A bellows would be cheaper
Something I'm not sure: Should I buy a bellows or should I buy he M-PE 65? A bellows would be cheaper
best regards
Markus
SONY a6000, Sigma 150mm 2,8 Makro HSM, Extention Tubes, Raynox DCR-250
visit me on flickr
Markus
SONY a6000, Sigma 150mm 2,8 Makro HSM, Extention Tubes, Raynox DCR-250
visit me on flickr
You mainly shoot outdoors don't you? I don't have an MPE (Olympus shooter) but I believe the MPE would be easier to use than a bellows in the field, and be less prone to harm (Bellows can be punctured!).Cyberspider wrote: Something I'm not sure: Should I buy a bellows or should I buy he M-PE 65? A bellows would be cheaper
Although on the other hand, a bellows is more versatile as you can achieve a vast range of magnifications with a range of focal length lenses... (though to be honest going beyond 5:1 in the field is pretty masochistic!)
I'd like the MPE too but it is phenomenally expensive!Cyberspider wrote:nice shot Rik and a very good reproduction scale . As you wrote/show it is an image for "Nature Photography -- Macro and Close-up"... very nice details!
Something I'm not sure: Should I buy a bellows or should I buy he M-PE 65? A bellows would be cheaper
Canon 5D and 30D | Canon IXUS 265HS | Cosina 100mm f3.5 macro | EF 75-300 f4.5-5.6 USM III | EF 50 f1.8 II | Slik 88 tripod | Apex Practicioner monocular microscope
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23603
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Thanks for the comments, folks!
Cyclops: Well, it was just sitting there, and this crazy idea came to me...
Laurie: "Brightfield"...hhmmm...suppose I should try a "darkfield" shot too?
Bruce: I was pleasantly surprised by the lack of problems shooting through the window. There must be some softening and loss of contrast. But even at actual pixels, the image looks pretty good in Photoshop. About the folding, I agree. I tried "virtually unfolding" the wing using Photoshop layers to do the mirror & align, then manually cloned out the duplicated veins. Here's what appeared.
Cyberspider: For studio work, bellows are better because you have more options. For field work, it seems like the MP-E 65 would have huge advantages. Bellows are fragile and fiddly, and something usually moves when you stop down to shoot. I don't own an MP-E 65, by the way. At this point, I can't imagine myself shooting enough high magnification in the field to justify the expense. But the high-mag field folks do seem to like it.
elf: Ah yes, the perils of "fine print". Some of us would argue it should be outlawed in legal documents too! But I suppose then all that would happen is they'd get bigger.
--Rik
Cyclops: Well, it was just sitting there, and this crazy idea came to me...
Laurie: "Brightfield"...hhmmm...suppose I should try a "darkfield" shot too?
Bruce: I was pleasantly surprised by the lack of problems shooting through the window. There must be some softening and loss of contrast. But even at actual pixels, the image looks pretty good in Photoshop. About the folding, I agree. I tried "virtually unfolding" the wing using Photoshop layers to do the mirror & align, then manually cloned out the duplicated veins. Here's what appeared.
Cyberspider: For studio work, bellows are better because you have more options. For field work, it seems like the MP-E 65 would have huge advantages. Bellows are fragile and fiddly, and something usually moves when you stop down to shoot. I don't own an MP-E 65, by the way. At this point, I can't imagine myself shooting enough high magnification in the field to justify the expense. But the high-mag field folks do seem to like it.
elf: Ah yes, the perils of "fine print". Some of us would argue it should be outlawed in legal documents too! But I suppose then all that would happen is they'd get bigger.
--Rik