Hi! I’m new here and need some help with choosing a lens for shooting both still and moving insects outside, mainly in my garden (for now).
I have a Nikon D3200 and would like to add a dedicated macro lens. I’ve recently taken the plunge and started using manual focus which is turning out to be easier than I expected so I’m hoping it may have opened up lens choices.
I can spend up to $400 and have been looking at the:
Tokina AT-X 100mm f/2.8 PRO D
Nikon 85mm 3.5g ed vr dx
Or a Nikon 105mm 2.8d
My understanding is that only the 85mm lens will autofocus but if I skip the autofocus will either of the other two work? And what other consideration do I need to think about.
Thank you!
Choosing a Nikon lens for insects but on budget
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 6:19 am
-
- Posts: 1152
- Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 5:24 am
Hi Laura,
How about the Sigma 105mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro for Nikon (I think it's the most recent version but you can already get this lens second hand "as new" for less than $400)? https://www.sigmaphoto.com/105mm-f2-8-e ... -hsm-macro https://www.lenstip.com/318.1-Lens_revi ... ction.html
The Sigma is fixed length; it doesn't extend forward. Both AF and MF work reasonably well. Unfortunately it doesn't have a manual aperture ring.
How about the Sigma 105mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro for Nikon (I think it's the most recent version but you can already get this lens second hand "as new" for less than $400)? https://www.sigmaphoto.com/105mm-f2-8-e ... -hsm-macro https://www.lenstip.com/318.1-Lens_revi ... ction.html
The Sigma is fixed length; it doesn't extend forward. Both AF and MF work reasonably well. Unfortunately it doesn't have a manual aperture ring.
You won't want autofocus all the time with macro, almost certainly, but it's useful. I usually autofocus then once it's locked, rock to get the eyes or whatever.
There aren't any bad macro lenses, a far as I know! Sigma, Tokina, Tamron are all fine - the later ones are generally better than earlier ones.
Sigmas recent ones have VR too which is a big help, though less so at closest distance.
Outside, you may find you'd like a longer lens than even 105mm. They all, I believe, shorten their focal length when focused close. 85 would be fine for table-top stuff, so if you can find one in budget, not a bad choice.
There aren't any bad macro lenses, a far as I know! Sigma, Tokina, Tamron are all fine - the later ones are generally better than earlier ones.
Sigmas recent ones have VR too which is a big help, though less so at closest distance.
Outside, you may find you'd like a longer lens than even 105mm. They all, I believe, shorten their focal length when focused close. 85 would be fine for table-top stuff, so if you can find one in budget, not a bad choice.
Chris R
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 6:19 am
Thank you I’ll take a look at it.
Ichthyophthirius wrote:Hi Laura,
How about the Sigma 105mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro for Nikon (I think it's the most recent version but you can already get this lens second hand "as new" for less than $400)? https://www.sigmaphoto.com/105mm-f2-8-e ... -hsm-macro https://www.lenstip.com/318.1-Lens_revi ... ction.html
The Sigma is fixed length; it doesn't extend forward. Both AF and MF work reasonably well. Unfortunately it doesn't have a manual aperture ring.
Laura
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 6:19 am
Thank! Unfortunately my budget won’t allow for a longer lens for now. I’m fortunate that I have a huge variety of insects in my yard and can sit quietly among them so I may be able to stay with a 100/105 and be okay...hopefully .
I also did some more research and it’s possible that the Tokina will af with the D3200 after all which is a plus.
Every time I think I’ve made a decision I get a bit overwhelmed again.
I also did some more research and it’s possible that the Tokina will af with the D3200 after all which is a plus.
Every time I think I’ve made a decision I get a bit overwhelmed again.
ChrisR wrote:You won't want autofocus all the time with macro, almost certainly, but it's useful. I usually autofocus then once it's locked, rock to get the eyes or whatever.
There aren't any bad macro lenses, a far as I know! Sigma, Tokina, Tamron are all fine - the later ones are generally better than earlier ones.
Sigmas recent ones have VR too which is a big help, though less so at closest distance.
Outside, you may find you'd like a longer lens than even 105mm. They all, I believe, shorten their focal length when focused close. 85 would be fine for table-top stuff, so if you can find one in budget, not a bad choice.
Laura
You should also consider Oshiro 60mm for 130$-170$ depending on your location.
https://www.photomacrography.net/forum/ ... ro&start=0
It's a manual focus lens.Also you must be aware that Nikon D3200 is not supporting auto exposure with manual lenses.
https://www.photomacrography.net/forum/ ... ro&start=0
It's a manual focus lens.Also you must be aware that Nikon D3200 is not supporting auto exposure with manual lenses.
-
- Posts: 2627
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:34 pm
- Location: United States
- Contact:
Lots of good advice in the thread already.Ecogeekmama wrote:Thank! Unfortunately my budget won’t allow for a longer lens for now. I’m fortunate that I have a huge variety of insects in my yard and can sit quietly among them so I may be able to stay with a 100/105 and be okay...hopefully .
I also did some more research and it’s possible that the Tokina will af with the D3200 after all which is a plus.
Every time I think I’ve made a decision I get a bit overwhelmed again.ChrisR wrote:You won't want autofocus all the time with macro, almost certainly, but it's useful. I usually autofocus then once it's locked, rock to get the eyes or whatever.
There aren't any bad macro lenses, a far as I know! Sigma, Tokina, Tamron are all fine - the later ones are generally better than earlier ones.
Sigmas recent ones have VR too which is a big help, though less so at closest distance.
Outside, you may find you'd like a longer lens than even 105mm. They all, I believe, shorten their focal length when focused close. 85 would be fine for table-top stuff, so if you can find one in budget, not a bad choice.
The Tokina seems like the best option for $400. Paying over that for the Nikon isnt the best value for your money unless there is another reason you want nikon. For $500+ it might be better to pick up a used Sigma 150mm macro.
There are some really good values on used lenses. The old Cosina 100 is supposedly good and they cost $100. I picked up an Vivtar 55mm 1:1 macro for $40 in mint shape but there are some serious LoCAs with old designs like that. I picked up a Sigma 70mm in the box, looked unused, for $250.
Going over 100mm isn't always better BTW. Being closer is sometimes better in the field.
If you are using flash more working distance means harsher light since the source is smaller. Longer FL also gives you is a flatter perspective.
Hope this helps.
Robert