£20 microscope, with battery illumination.
https://www.maplin.co.uk/p/celestron-op ... -kit-a73uk
For the grandchildren?
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
For the grandchildren?
Chris R
I don't think so, at least if you want them loving Microscopy. My opinion is that they are so useless that they can prevent future use of microscopes.
At the high school lab we have a pair of this kind of toy microscopes, so ridiculously bad that I used them as (joke) penalization for the students that didn't follow the rules on how to use and care the true microscopes.
At the high school lab we have a pair of this kind of toy microscopes, so ridiculously bad that I used them as (joke) penalization for the students that didn't follow the rules on how to use and care the true microscopes.
Pau
I was curious and bought one of the child bino microscopes
https://www.amazon.com/AMSCOPE-KIDS-SE1 ... B005C6HK00
it is really very good in its limitations and much more fun to use and look on insects. I got it under a German brand name Bresser. But you can find it on aliexpress.
https://www.aliexpress.com/store/produc ... 42471.html
https://www.amazon.com/AMSCOPE-KIDS-SE1 ... B005C6HK00
it is really very good in its limitations and much more fun to use and look on insects. I got it under a German brand name Bresser. But you can find it on aliexpress.
https://www.aliexpress.com/store/produc ... 42471.html
It is better than no microscope. And you can use it as portable field scope, if it is mainly plastic and light weight. That is how I use my AmScope plastic scopes.
It also depends on how old your grandchildren are.
For primary school age, a dissecting scope is better.
For high school age, they should be able to enjoy a better compound scope.
You also want to know what their subject of interest is and that may determine the scope type. Do they want to see single cell protists, or insects/minerals?
It also depends on how old your grandchildren are.
For primary school age, a dissecting scope is better.
For high school age, they should be able to enjoy a better compound scope.
You also want to know what their subject of interest is and that may determine the scope type. Do they want to see single cell protists, or insects/minerals?
Selling my Canon FD 200mm F/2.8 lens
- Charles Krebs
- Posts: 5865
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
- Location: Issaquah, WA USA
- Contact:
I agree that low power is the way to go with young kids. It would be nice to have a low power (10X to 30X) monocular scope. My experience has been that with stereo scopes the trickiest part is getting the kids to use a proper interpupillary settings, and for some reason they always seem to reach up and try to focus using the focusable eyepiece (thus messing up the focus between the two eyepieces). If you've got more than one kid using it you can be guaranteed that you will need to regularly monitor and reset binocular eyepiece settings.
In some respects I have actually had better luck with a basic monocular "compound scope" with a 4X objective.
In some respects I have actually had better luck with a basic monocular "compound scope" with a 4X objective.
-
- Posts: 1966
- Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:16 am
- Location: Bigfork, Montana
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 5090
- Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:31 pm
For the grandkids
I buy fine old microscopes to restore at www.shopgoodwill.com
Use the search term "microscope" You will be surprised at what is available. A few years ago I got a very nice Bausch&Lomb at a Goodwill store for $24.
Mike
Use the search term "microscope" You will be surprised at what is available. A few years ago I got a very nice Bausch&Lomb at a Goodwill store for $24.
Mike
Michael Reese Much FRMS EMS Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA