I'd really like to produce a nice image of a Rotifer but I tried and I'm a long way off so I'm practising on things that don't move so fast! They were in the same sample of stream water and are individual stacks formed in to a composite image. Is that OK? - or too much editing.... the scale is the same.
Algae
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23621
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Re: Algae
Certainly OK. This forum has no objection to almost any amount of image editing, as long as the text tells us what was done.micro_pix wrote: individual stacks formed in to a composite image. Is that OK? - or too much editing....
The image is very nice, by the way.
--Rik
Thanks for the comments. I've realised that there is an advantage of tidying the background and filling it with a single colour - it reduces the jpg file size a lot so you can have less compression in the bits that matter.
I think the two filaments are Spirogyras but I haven't worked out what the oblong one is. It was about 205 x 85 microns.
I think the two filaments are Spirogyras but I haven't worked out what the oblong one is. It was about 205 x 85 microns.
- carlos.uruguay
- Posts: 5358
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:05 pm
- Location: Uruguay - Montevideo - America del Sur
- Contact:
Nice! Agree with Rik. As long as you are transparent with the changes I see no reason not to be creative! I did the same with my shots of Euglena. Of course, I was also open with that it was edited.
http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/v ... hp?t=34946
http://www.photomacrography.net/forum/v ... hp?t=34946
https://www.instagram.com/micromundusphotography
https://www.flickr.com/photos/micromundus
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0UdYN ... YH_litDZjA
Olympus BX51 | Olympus CX23 | Olympus SZ4045 | Zeiss EVO LS 10
https://www.flickr.com/photos/micromundus
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0UdYN ... YH_litDZjA
Olympus BX51 | Olympus CX23 | Olympus SZ4045 | Zeiss EVO LS 10