www.photomacrography.net :: View topic - Predict DoF at low magnifications
www.photomacrography.net Forum Index
An online community dedicated to the practices of photomacrography, close-up and macro photography, and photomicrography.
Photomacrography Front Page Amateurmicrography Front Page
Old Forums/Galleries
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Predict DoF at low magnifications

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.photomacrography.net Forum Index -> Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nielsgeode



Joined: 31 Jul 2012
Posts: 210
Location: Groningen, Netherlands

PostPosted: Tue Nov 25, 2014 1:29 pm    Post subject: Predict DoF at low magnifications Reply with quote

Just wondering: at f/2n the DoF is twice as the DoF at f/n

How does this work with change in magnifications?

The "correct" aperture is of course calculated from f = f * (1 + x) with x = magnification. However, at magnifications below 1x (e.g. 1:5 and 1:4), the change in aperture is small. Therefore, you can aproximate with x = 0.

Keeping this assumption in mind, what would be the relative new DoF at 1:4 magnification compared to 1:5? Is this 0.2 / 0.25 = 0.8, so a decrease of the DoF by ~20%?

Can someone please make this clear to me?

Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
rjlittlefield
Site Admin


Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 17605
Location: Richland, Washington State, USA

PostPosted: Tue Nov 25, 2014 2:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Can someone please make this clear to me?

Maybe. Bear with me as I step through this...

Under reasonable assumptions, the "exact" formula is the classic one given by Lefkowitz that total depth of field DOF depends on the circle of confusion C, the nominal ("ring") f-number f_r, and the magnification m according to this formula:

DOF(C,f_r,m) = 2*C*f_r*(m+1)/(m^2)

If we hold C and f_r constant, and take the ratio of two DOFs at different m's, then we find that the ratio can be written as

DOF(ma) / DOF(mb) = ((ma+1)/(mb+1)) * (mb/ma)^2

The first fraction on the right side is a ratio of effective f-numbers, which you've chosen to ignore when you say "approximate with x=0". The second fraction, which dominates under the low-mag conditions you've specified, is the square of the ratio of magnifications.

By the simplified formula, going from 1:5 to 1:4 gets you a DOF ratio of 0.2 / 0.25 squared = 0.64 .

The more exact formula would give 0.66667, not significantly different in this case.

Bottom line: if the effective f-number does not change, then DOF varies inversely as the square of the magnification. It turns out that this relationship holds true under a wide range of conditions, including cases where the simple classic formula breaks down.

--Rik
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    www.photomacrography.net Forum Index -> Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group