I collected some water that had collected in a shallow depression in the trunk of a downed tree. It was obvious something was "growing" in it. It turned out to be full of this cyanobacteria (along with a pretty good number of one type of rotifer).
100X S Plan Apo, Canon 350D, DIC
Cyanobacteria
Moderators: rjlittlefield, ChrisR, Chris S., Pau
- Charles Krebs
- Posts: 5865
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:02 pm
- Location: Issaquah, WA USA
- Contact:
- Wolfgang Bettighofer
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 1:42 pm
- Location: Kiel, Germany
Another one !
Hi !
I share the enthusiasm for cyanobacteria, although my knowledge is very limited. If one could call that knowledge (they are blue, aren´t they ?).
This probably owes to the fact that the insights one could take
with a ordinary microscope is limited, as the organells are too small for the visible range of radiation. Nevertheless, they are cute !
Kindest regards,
Norman
I share the enthusiasm for cyanobacteria, although my knowledge is very limited. If one could call that knowledge (they are blue, aren´t they ?).
This probably owes to the fact that the insights one could take
with a ordinary microscope is limited, as the organells are too small for the visible range of radiation. Nevertheless, they are cute !
Kindest regards,
Norman
-
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 5:56 am
- Contact:
Re: Another one !
Hi Norman,
Is that Oscillatoria in your photo? Very interesting subjects.
Thanks .
Tom
Is that Oscillatoria in your photo? Very interesting subjects.
Thanks .
Tom
Hi !
Because of the transparent "wrap", i would go for Lyngbya.
Probably Lyngbya martensiana.
The pictures have to be taken with care, it was a illumination in a very narrow angle, i still play with that. In that picture the "wrap" is more visible,
the colony is suffering in a marmelade jar stuffed with some probe of the northern sea. Some diatoms in there, i have to puddle `em out.
Here is another one. In the upper part you could see some of the empty wraps:
I just found the "color curve" feature in gimp. If the thingys should look like neon bulbs, i dont know why.... ;- )
Kindest regards,
Norman[/url]
Because of the transparent "wrap", i would go for Lyngbya.
Probably Lyngbya martensiana.
The pictures have to be taken with care, it was a illumination in a very narrow angle, i still play with that. In that picture the "wrap" is more visible,
the colony is suffering in a marmelade jar stuffed with some probe of the northern sea. Some diatoms in there, i have to puddle `em out.
Here is another one. In the upper part you could see some of the empty wraps:
I just found the "color curve" feature in gimp. If the thingys should look like neon bulbs, i dont know why.... ;- )
Kindest regards,
Norman[/url]
-
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 5:56 am
- Contact:
Norman wrote:
Because of the transparent "wrap", i would go for Lyngbya.
Probably Lyngbya martensiana....................
I just found the "color curve" feature in gimp. If the thingys should look like neon bulbs, i dont know why.... ;-"
Cool. I haven't come across these organisms as yet.
Good further info and specimens at The micro*scope site:
http://starcentral.mbl.edu/microscope/p ... mageid=493
http://starcentral.mbl.edu/microscope/p ... on=Lyngbya
Tom
Because of the transparent "wrap", i would go for Lyngbya.
Probably Lyngbya martensiana....................
I just found the "color curve" feature in gimp. If the thingys should look like neon bulbs, i dont know why.... ;-"
Cool. I haven't come across these organisms as yet.
Good further info and specimens at The micro*scope site:
http://starcentral.mbl.edu/microscope/p ... mageid=493
http://starcentral.mbl.edu/microscope/p ... on=Lyngbya
Tom
- rjlittlefield
- Site Admin
- Posts: 23602
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:34 am
- Location: Richland, Washington State, USA
- Contact:
Norman,
Your pictures are interesting and we are delighted to have them posted.
However, as a matter of forum organization, we request that you start a new topic with your own pictures, rather than appending them to a topic started by someone else.
Please see the Image Posting Guidelines and this recent posting for further details.
Thanks very much,
--Rik
Your pictures are interesting and we are delighted to have them posted.
However, as a matter of forum organization, we request that you start a new topic with your own pictures, rather than appending them to a topic started by someone else.
Please see the Image Posting Guidelines and this recent posting for further details.
Thanks very much,
--Rik
O.K.
Hi !
"The safest and often the most effective approach is to open a new topic with your own pictures, and link to it from the other topic."
O.K., i will refrain from illustrated comments to other picutures.
I never came to the idea that one could be offended by "answer-pictures" in his thread, unless i read your recent posting about etiquette.
In that special case, i did not consider the picture valuable enough presenting it in an own thread. It was just a byproduct in the preparation of a presentation about photosynthesis.
So - to avoid conflicts, i will just bring up pictures in an own thread - but this will probably happen more seldom, because my microscopy-time is limited, and i do not want to bother with less interesting stuff.
Kindest regards,
Norman
"The safest and often the most effective approach is to open a new topic with your own pictures, and link to it from the other topic."
O.K., i will refrain from illustrated comments to other picutures.
I never came to the idea that one could be offended by "answer-pictures" in his thread, unless i read your recent posting about etiquette.
In that special case, i did not consider the picture valuable enough presenting it in an own thread. It was just a byproduct in the preparation of a presentation about photosynthesis.
So - to avoid conflicts, i will just bring up pictures in an own thread - but this will probably happen more seldom, because my microscopy-time is limited, and i do not want to bother with less interesting stuff.
Kindest regards,
Norman