Cool 3D model, and images.
I don't see the problem with long shutter speeds. I turn my lights down so that I can expose for 8 seconds- (my method of eliminating the effect of shutter-induced blur). The stacks do take longer, but I'm off doing something else.
--Chris S.
Search found 3211 matches
- Sat Jan 13, 2024 1:29 pm
- Forum: Technical and Studio Photography -- Macro and Close-up
- Topic: some scales
- Replies: 140
- Views: 14930
- Thu Jan 11, 2024 9:52 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: Rocking bristles
- Replies: 4
- Views: 646
Re: Rocking bristles
Looks really good to my eye.
--Chris S.
--Chris S.
- Sun Jan 07, 2024 2:45 pm
- Forum: Beginners Micro
- Topic: Down the rabbit hole… and some questions
- Replies: 10
- Views: 889
Re: Down the rabbit hole… and some questions
Matthias, welcome to the forum! :D You are moving fast. This is a very nice "proof of concept." I particularly admire the way you use light. With the objective you're using, my standard step increment is 2 µm. Am pretty sure 4 µm would work with only a moderate reduction in fine detail contrast. Agr...
- Fri Dec 29, 2023 11:06 pm
- Forum: Beginners Macro
- Topic: A beetle
- Replies: 7
- Views: 981
Re: A beetle
As an aside, I find it interesting that in a "Beginners" forum, everyone posting their edits is not what this forum is about It would seem to me that this is exactly what this forum should be about. How else do beginners improve without critical feedback? Perhaps a separate forum could be establish...
- Wed Dec 27, 2023 10:25 pm
- Forum: Beginners Macro
- Topic: A beetle
- Replies: 7
- Views: 981
Re: A beetle
Gedaliah, Another good piece of work. I do have some ideas for your image, though--take or leave them as suits your vision for your work. I've taken the liberty of editing your image. Normally, forum etiquette is to ask before doing this, but since you asked for "any and all feedback," I'm assuming ...
- Wed Dec 27, 2023 9:40 pm
- Forum: Beginners Macro
- Topic: My second insect shot
- Replies: 8
- Views: 915
Re: My second insect shot
Gedaliah, Welcome to the forum! :D I agree with the others--nice job for early in the macro journey. And since you're here asking for constructive feedback--bravo for this, sir--you're going to get even better. We've all experienced the frustration of fighting with equipment. Once you get a solid ma...
- Thu Nov 16, 2023 1:08 am
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: Taking the 200mm micro-Nikkor Past Lifesize
- Replies: 27
- Views: 9244
Re: Taking the 200mm micro-Nikkor Past Lifesize
. . . unfortunately, it is too unwieldy, even without tubes. The tripod collar is near the mounting flange, and reversing it puts the collar at the far end away from the camera, throwing the whole thing way off balance. If I still had my specimen of this lens, I'd try fastening a longish Arca-Swiss...
- Wed Nov 15, 2023 2:38 pm
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: Taking the 200mm micro-Nikkor Past Lifesize
- Replies: 27
- Views: 9244
Re: Taking the 200mm micro-Nikkor Past Lifesize
Tim, have you tried using a reversing ring to mount the 200mm micro-Nikkor reversed on the extension tubes? This would be likely be unwieldy, given the size of that lens, but it might work. I sold my specimen of that lens--despite its excellent reputation, my copy was something of an optical dud. --...
- Sun Nov 12, 2023 4:17 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: "Halo'ing" when focus stacking many images
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3570
Re: "Halo'ing" when focus stacking many images
Yusuf, welcome to the forum!
I don't see an attached image.
--Chris S.
I don't see an attached image.
--Chris S.
- Thu Nov 09, 2023 8:38 pm
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: Rodenstock Apo-Rodagon D 75mm 4.0 M 1:1 - quick test
- Replies: 17
- Views: 4446
Re: Rodenstock Apo-Rodagon D 75mm 4.0 M 1:1 - quick test
. . . there are very mixed reviews when it comes to its use as a macro lens - which I think is mostly due to its behaviour when used with the aperture wide open at 4.0. While it's quite sharp at 4.0, that's not the 'taking aperture' that Rodenstock had in mind. They designed the lens to be used at ...
- Fri Nov 03, 2023 8:00 pm
- Forum: Community Members and Friends
- Topic: The problem with Microscopes is...
- Replies: 18
- Views: 5935
Re: The problem with Microscopes is...
Well done! If I find such a beast, I'll hit "buy" in an instant.
--Chris S.
- Fri Nov 03, 2023 7:58 pm
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: 2x handheld macro upgrades for Pentax body
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4121
Re: 2x handheld macro upgrades for Pentax body
Ksparks519, welcome aboard! :D I don't disagree with anything Mark said. Older macro lenses tend to be both good in quality and friendly on the budget. In my experience, close-up work is easier, and quality is better, with a dedicated macro lens that has a longish focal length. The 50mm macro lenses...
- Wed Nov 01, 2023 6:58 pm
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: I need a reticle "holder-inner" for a Nikon eyepiece...
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2016
- Sat Oct 28, 2023 8:29 pm
- Forum: Beginners Macro
- Topic: Canon 70D beginning macro
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2029
Re: Canon 70D beginning macro
Helium2, welcome to posting! :D I don't know your specific subject interests for macro and close-up photography. But let me suggest that you strongly consider buying a dedicated, long-focal-length, standard "macro" lens. (I put the word "macro" in quotation marks because this use of this word has ma...
- Mon Oct 23, 2023 10:03 pm
- Forum: Equipment Discussions
- Topic: Printing Nikkor
- Replies: 32
- Views: 5798
Re: Printing Nikkor
Regarding Robert's demonstration of his Makro-Symmar 180: Agreed, the lens looks remarkably sharp. But that's not all that's sharp. --crop.jpg A hand-held 180mm lens, at 1:1 magnification, at 1/80 of a second--and this sharp? Wish I could still do this, but not since my twenties. Meanwhile, I'll car...