Search found 20026 matches
- Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:52 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: Making scale bars with no calculations (OT-->diffraction)
- Replies: 52
- Views: 32931
"Interact?" Um, yeah, "interact". Superposition is a special kind of interaction from which the original waves eventually emerge unchanged. At least that's the way articles in the SIAM Journal talk about it. (SIAM = Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics.) That model gives a nice transition t...
- Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:14 am
- Forum: Macro and Close-up Archives
- Topic: These were taken with a 300mm lens
- Replies: 19
- Views: 5406
If I am wrong no doubt somebody will correct my understanding of the differences between the two types of lenses? What you wrote sounds like a great summary to me. One is designed specifically to work well at short distances and may not even focus at infinity; the other is primarily designed to wor...
- Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:33 am
- Forum: Macro and Close-up Archives
- Topic: These were taken with a 300mm lens
- Replies: 19
- Views: 5406
More than passing, I would say! Definitely a useful taxonomy.puzzledpaul wrote:Maybe of passing interest ?
http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/
--Rik
- Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:10 pm
- Forum: Macro and Close-up Archives
- Topic: These were taken with a 300mm lens
- Replies: 19
- Views: 5406
is a diopter something like a converter? Strictly speaking, a "diopter" is a unit of measurement commonly used for lenses. The strength of eyeglasses is specified in diopters. So is the strength of auxiliary lenses added in front of regular camera lenses to permit focusing closer. Because of that l...
- Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:52 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: Making scale bars with no calculations (OT-->diffraction)
- Replies: 52
- Views: 32931
my objection is to a one word answer Agreed -- one word answers are seldom adequate, and even less often helpful. You wrote earlier, "I am fully aware of what diffraction is". But I don't know what your awareness is. In particular I don't know exactly what you mean by the word, even after all these...
- Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:59 pm
- Forum: Macro and Close-up Archives
- Topic: These were taken with a 300mm lens
- Replies: 19
- Views: 5406
With respect to your original Qs If you're intending to mainly take pics of butterflies, in a 'setting' - then (strictly speaking) they're unlikely to be 'macro' shots because the field of view is likely to be much greater than 22mm :) Hark! Do I feel a gentle tug on my chain? :wink: In light of pr...
- Sun Jan 20, 2008 10:34 pm
- Forum: Macro and Close-up Archives
- Topic: First post
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2606
- Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:49 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: Making scale bars with no calculations (OT-->diffraction)
- Replies: 52
- Views: 32931
For the terminally curious, here is a reduced-size animation showing the effect of changing aperture size, for the case of converging spherical waves (point source imaged with a perfect lens). Orange line marks the aperture; cyan line marks the center of the incoming spherical waves. This aperture h...
- Sun Jan 20, 2008 7:26 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: Sensor size: how does it matter?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 15966
- Sun Jan 20, 2008 5:31 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: Sensor size: how does it matter?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 15966
Is it actually physically possible to keep the same perspective (camera-to-subject distance), FOV, DOF, shutter speed, and the same number of photons reaching the pixel sites? At infinity, it is possible. But if the magnification on 35mm sensor is 1x, what is happening with a smaller sensor? Is it ...
- Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:34 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: Making scale bars with no calculations (OT-->diffraction)
- Replies: 52
- Views: 32931
Simple explanations of complex phenomena are rarely comprehensive! Now there is a pithy quote if I've ever heard one. This issue of "Is it diffraction or is it spatial filtering?" has been bouncing around in my head since you guys raised the question. It got so bad that I finally went back to the b...
- Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:56 pm
- Forum: Beginners Micro
- Topic: Slides
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3197
- Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:04 pm
- Forum: Macro and Close-up Archives
- Topic: two more "Head Studies"
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1630
Doug, Subject pose and stacking technique looks OK in these shots, but I still find the lighting too harsh to show off these subjects to best advantage. Notice the large amount of "black" areas, where not enough light is getting back to the camera to register. Part of those are shadows, part are shi...
- Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:54 am
- Forum: Beginners Micro
- Topic: Thousands of green things
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4040
On the top right of your photo are the "toes" by which they can attach to something solid. Top left , I think. (Just a typo, but possibly confusing.) BJ, thanks for responding to Mo's requests for ID on these things. :D It really helps to have somebody who has looked at enough variations of micro-c...
- Fri Jan 18, 2008 6:22 pm
- Forum: Macro and Micro Technique and Technical Discussions
- Topic: My rig. Tips on lining up subject movement?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4398
Laurie, These photos help a great deal -- thanks. Here's what I recommend...presuming that you have a few basic tools... Ditch the tripod -- it'll cause you nothing but grief. Obtain for yourself the following parts: 1 large piece of plywood or fiberboard, preferably 5/8" or thicker. An assortment o...